Greater Philadelphia Expo Center - Oaks, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TSIMIKLIS aphrodite | - | - | - | - | - | 8% | 91% |
| 2 | CAO Amelie | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
| 3 | ZHU Ella | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 51% | |
| 3 | XING Melly | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% | |
| 5 | EPSTEIN Naomi | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 39% | 22% |
| 6 | SHIN Elizabeth | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 57% | |
| 7 | LIN Yunong | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 59% | |
| 8 | CHOI Cara | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% | |
| 9 | SHUTZER Lily | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 40% | 9% | |
| 10 | CHUNG Stella | - | - | 3% | 20% | 49% | 29% | |
| 11 | LEO Jenna | - | - | 2% | 15% | 46% | 37% | |
| 12 | ZHANG Caroline | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 13 | HAFEZ Sahar | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 5% |
| 14 | FEDER Acadia | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | |
| 15 | HOU Xu | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 16 | HOLLIS Priscillia | 2% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 17 | WANG Joann | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 18 | ZHENG Annalyn | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% | |
| 19 | SUN Erin | - | 5% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 6% | |
| 20 | JUNCADELLA Lucy | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 21 | WU Charlotte | - | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 22 | FAN Melody | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 23 | XU Charlene | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 1% |
| 24 | LI Christina | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% | |
| 25 | VACCARO Lillian | 2% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 1% | |
| 26 | WAN Celine | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 4% | |
| 27 | PELLE Lia | - | 5% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 28 | BENNETT Emi | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% | - |
| 29 | DONG Katelyn | 33% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 30 | HEMPHILL Mia | 2% | 17% | 39% | 32% | 9% | 1% | |
| 31 | BALIN Sophia | 6% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 32 | BEKIYANTS Elizabeth | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 33 | VO Evelyn | 2% | 14% | 36% | 35% | 12% | 1% | |
| 34 | GOMEZ Sofia | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 35 | SHI Micah | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 5% | - |
| 36 | HUSSAIN Maya | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 37 | OTTAVIANO Maris | 9% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 38 | PIERSIG Eleanor | 2% | 14% | 40% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
| 39 | STEWART Isla | 1% | 12% | 37% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
| 40 | ZUCKER Eleanor | 30% | 46% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 41 | LIN Claire | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
| 42 | CHAN Kaitlyn | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 2% | |
| 43 | KANDALAFT Emma | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 44 | GUSTAFSSON Anna | 32% | 46% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 45 | SONG Sarah | 20% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 46 | LOBO Sophie | 10% | 36% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 47 | MCCLELLAN Florence | 14% | 40% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 48 | ROSS Stella | 30% | 48% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 49 | LENZ Phoebe | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 50 | LIANG Jasmine | 15% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 51 | KIM Minjoo | 40% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 52 | GIBSON Leia | 45% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 53 | JUVVADI Aanika | 25% | 45% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | WEINER Charlotte | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 55 | HUDSON Patterson | 6% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 56 | LEVY Zia | 27% | 44% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 57 | MA Cloris | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.