Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LUO Ashley | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
| 2 | TAYLOR Kiera S. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 2% |
| 3 | MEHROTRA Anya | - | - | - | 6% | 30% | 46% | 18% |
| 3 | LI Bingqi | - | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% | |
| 5 | ZHANG Tina | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
| 6 | FALLON Kyle R. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 42% | 15% |
| 7 | GU Sarah | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% |
| 8 | CHERNYSHOVA Victoria | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% | |
| 9 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 33% | 32% | 12% |
| 10 | XUAN Nicole J. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% |
| 11 | MUELLER Emma M. | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 12 | LU Samantha R. | 2% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | |
| 13 | LEE Yedda | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% | |
| 14 | DESAI Meera P. | - | 4% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
| 15 | YIN Julia | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 9% |
| 16 | YU Nicole J. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 17 | RANDLEMAN Teresa | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 18 | BEEM Marin | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 19 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 22% |
| 20 | HAFEEZ Hiba | 2% | 10% | 26% | 32% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 20 | KIM Angelina | - | 5% | 27% | 42% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 22 | LI Suri | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
| 23 | MARTINO Alessandra | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% | |
| 24 | HAFEEZ Hania | 5% | 31% | 42% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 25 | SMOTRITSKY Mia | 19% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 26 | XIAO Ruien | - | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 27 | ZHENG Linden | 28% | 47% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 28 | BRUNSON Nile | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 29 | ZIGALO Elizabeth | 1% | 11% | 37% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 30 | HU Chelsea | 12% | 32% | 33% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 31 | LIU Nicole | 16% | 44% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | FURMAN Maria | 12% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | SUN Hanya | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
| 34 | KRUMHOLZ Nicole | 13% | 41% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 35 | PRIHODKO Nina | 19% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 36 | KEE Bea Isabelle | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 37 | WALOR Riley H. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 25% | 6% | |
| 38 | NGUYEN Kira | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
| 39 | ZHU Serene M. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | - |
| 40 | AZMEH Nour | 1% | 6% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 12% | 2% |
| 41 | SIRICHENKO Eva | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 42 | CAFASSO Natalya | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 3% | |
| 43 | NGUYEN Jolie T. | - | < 1% | 3% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 11% |
| 44 | NELSON Grace E. | 15% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 45 | MISHIMA Audrey | 3% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 46 | YOU Isabel B. | 15% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 47 | HUANG Emily | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 48 | LIN Elaine | 7% | 39% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | SHON Celine | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 50 | WITTER Catherine A. | < 1% | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 51 | KUMAR Eva | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | LIU Sheryl | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 54 | SMUK Alexandra S. | 1% | 10% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 2% | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.