Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LUO Ashley | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 6% |
| 2 | TAYLOR Kiera S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 23% | 2% |
| 3 | MEHROTRA Anya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% | 18% |
| 3 | LI Bingqi | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 11% | |
| 5 | ZHANG Tina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 16% |
| 6 | FALLON Kyle R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 15% |
| 7 | GU Sarah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 10% |
| 8 | CHERNYSHOVA Victoria | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 27% | |
| 9 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 12% |
| 10 | XUAN Nicole J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 21% |
| 11 | MUELLER Emma M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
| 12 | LU Samantha R. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% | |
| 13 | LEE Yedda | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% | |
| 14 | DESAI Meera P. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 48% | 17% | 3% |
| 15 | YIN Julia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 38% | 9% |
| 16 | YU Nicole J. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 17 | RANDLEMAN Teresa | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 5% |
| 18 | BEEM Marin | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% | 1% |
| 19 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 63% | 22% |
| 20 | HAFEEZ Hiba | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 20 | KIM Angelina | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 22 | LI Suri | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 12% |
| 23 | MARTINO Alessandra | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% | |
| 24 | HAFEEZ Hania | 100% | 95% | 64% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
| 25 | SMOTRITSKY Mia | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 26 | XIAO Ruien | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 27 | ZHENG Linden | 100% | 72% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 28 | BRUNSON Nile | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 29 | ZIGALO Elizabeth | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 30 | HU Chelsea | 100% | 88% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 31 | LIU Nicole | 100% | 84% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | FURMAN Maria | 100% | 88% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | SUN Hanya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% |
| 34 | KRUMHOLZ Nicole | 100% | 87% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 35 | PRIHODKO Nina | 100% | 81% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 36 | KEE Bea Isabelle | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 37 | WALOR Riley H. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% | |
| 38 | NGUYEN Kira | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 39 | ZHU Serene M. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% | - |
| 40 | AZMEH Nour | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 41% | 14% | 2% |
| 41 | SIRICHENKO Eva | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 42 | CAFASSO Natalya | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 3% | |
| 43 | NGUYEN Jolie T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% |
| 44 | NELSON Grace E. | 100% | 85% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 45 | MISHIMA Audrey | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 46 | YOU Isabel B. | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 47 | HUANG Emily | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 48 | LIN Elaine | 100% | 93% | 54% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 49 | SHON Celine | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 50 | WITTER Catherine A. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 51 | KUMAR Eva | 100% | 78% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | LIU Sheryl | 100% | 92% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 54 | SMUK Alexandra S. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 21% | 2% | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.