Rio Hotel and Casino - Las Vegas, NV, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CRICOL Damian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 35% | |
| 2 | LEE Brady | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 26% | |
| 3 | BRIMMER Robert (Trey) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% |
| 3 | GU Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 12% |
| 5 | LI Yidong A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 25% |
| 6 | IM Tyler | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 38% |
| 7 | WANG Tiger | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 20% |
| 8 | IYER Neil | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 26% | |
| 9 | WONG David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 32% |
| 10 | YU BOWEN | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 50% | |
| 11 | TANI Tino | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% |
| 12 | ZEYU wu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 55% |
| 13 | CHEN Jack | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 11% |
| 14 | LI Linze | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 19% | |
| 15 | LUCAS William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 17% | |
| 16 | LUC Cedric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 29% |
| 17 | KANG Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 60% |
| 18 | IRVINE Patrick | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
| 19 | MEADE Liam R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 20 | CHEN Cooper | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% | 5% |
| 21 | LI Ayden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 49% |
| 22 | VO Blake | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 24% | 4% |
| 23 | HE Zhikai (kyle) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 21% | 3% |
| 24 | XIAO Brayden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% | 17% | |
| 25 | HWANG Hagan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 17% | |
| 26 | GRIGORIEV Roman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 19% |
| 27 | ZENG Oscar | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 28 | FISCHER Noel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
| 29 | BEKDJANOV Arthur | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 18% |
| 30 | WANG Ryan | 100% | 85% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | ROH Jaden | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 7% | |
| 32 | WARD Carter | 100% | 86% | 48% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | GATTO Enzo P. | 100% | 98% | 79% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
| 34 | WONG Hawken | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 49% | 12% | |
| 35 | WANG Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 40% | 6% |
| 36 | LEE Nathan Uju | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 50% | 9% |
| 37 | ZHANG KAIQI | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 19% |
| 38 | LIANG Preston | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 21% | 2% | - |
| 38 | HAO Johnny | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 13% | 1% | |
| 40 | KANG Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | 25% | |
| 41 | LEE Brendan | 100% | 100% | 93% | 63% | 16% | 1% | |
| 42 | YU Ian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 9% |
| 43 | HRISTOV Nickolas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 14% | 1% |
| 44 | WONG Ron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 40% | 8% |
| 45 | TENG Lucas | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 46 | LI Ryan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
| 47 | LIU Daniel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 48 | WU Lucas | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 7% | - |
| 49 | DECHEV Vlad | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 50 | KUANG Cyrus | 100% | 81% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 51 | WANG David | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 52 | CHI Everett | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 6% | |
| 53 | YUEN Caleb | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 26% | 4% | |
| 54 | YANG Jake | 100% | 94% | 56% | 14% | 1% | - | |
| 55 | MA Cing Tim | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 4% | |
| 56 | BRADIC Andreja | 100% | 96% | 65% | 20% | 2% | - | |
| 57 | KIM Enoch | 100% | 52% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 58 | AIKMAN Kai | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 59 | LUO Gavin | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 60 | OU Rigel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
| 61 | HUANG Keon | 100% | 88% | 51% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
| 62 | FUGATE Logan | 100% | 91% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 63 | LEE Kyle | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 64 | HO Alden | 100% | 98% | 75% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
| 65 | BROOKS Drake | 100% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 66 | GU Dean | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 67 | CHEN Aaron | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 68 | FAN Yuchen | 100% | 91% | 59% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 69 | ZHANG Caleb | 100% | 97% | 76% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 70 | WANG James | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 71 | RAMBHIA Smit | 100% | 91% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 72 | WESTMORELAND-BROWN Cole | 100% | 92% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 73 | KANG Nathan | 100% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 74 | RHODES Bryce | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 75 | HSIEH Maxwell | 100% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 75 | ZHOU Ruibo | 100% | 73% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 77 | LIU Paul | 100% | 79% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 78 | ELSAYED Yahia | 100% | 80% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 79 | KANG Leo H. | 100% | 66% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 80 | WALKER Camden | 100% | 77% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 81 | JANG Seohyeon | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 82 | DING Orlando | 100% | 93% | 59% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 83 | SINGH Swaran | 100% | 65% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 84 | HOLMES Xavier | 100% | 85% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 85 | CAO Chuck | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 6% | - | - |
| 85 | YU Sean | 100% | 58% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 87 | ADAMS Jordan | 100% | 83% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 88 | HE Richard | 100% | 86% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 90 | KIM Leo | 100% | 64% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 91 | STERN Kazuki | 100% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 92 | WU Dustin | 100% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 93 | MILLER Ari | 100% | 82% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 94 | DENG Richard | 100% | 92% | 60% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.