Fredericksburg Convention Center - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SIRICO Thomas (Tommy) P. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 29% | 68% |
2 | DIAZ Julio P. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 76% |
3 | NICHOLSON II Michael A. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 33% | 63% |
3 | DERBY Joshua (Josh) C. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 28% | 52% | 13% |
5 | LEE Hans | 15% | 41% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | |
6 | CHAN Geoffrey | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 3% | - |
7 | PASHBY Stephen N. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 42% | 45% | |
8 | KARNAVAS William | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 7% | - |
9 | DE BARROS CONTI Thibaut | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 36% | 8% | - |
10 | FADL Omar | - | - | - | 4% | 26% | 53% | 16% |
11 | BUCHANAN Jonah | 8% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% | - | |
12 | RUSANOV Oleg | - | 2% | 15% | 40% | 34% | 8% | - |
13 | GUERRERO Gonzalo | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 35% | 17% | 1% |
14 | CROWE Nathan | 19% | 43% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
15 | MAHNKEN Thomas G. | 3% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
16 | BAZZLE Christopher E. | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
17 | DANTON Gary | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% | - |
18 | ZAIDI Sohail | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
19 | ROGERS Windell | 2% | 19% | 46% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
20 | ROUNTREE Andrew | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
21 | TOLENTINO SR. Francis | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
22 | CHAO Pierre | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
23 | DORFMAN Mitchell (Mitch) J. | - | < 1% | 4% | 22% | 51% | 23% | |
24 | PRIVITERA Dino | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
25 | CHANDLEE Thomas | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
26 | BERGEN Kevin | 39% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
27 | CHANDLEE Richard (Rick) | 27% | 50% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.