Liontree Arena (RIMAC) @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KOVALEV Daniil N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 61% | |
| 2 | LI Yidong A. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 8% | |
| 3 | GREMILLION Obadiah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 32% | |
| 3 | TANI Tino | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% | |
| 5 | ANDRES Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 43% |
| 6 | YU Casey | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
| 7 | YANG Phillip | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 40% | |
| 8 | CAO Oliver | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 30% | |
| 9 | YAP Kah Kai (Cayden) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 29% | |
| 10 | ZHANG Kaixuan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% | |
| 11 | CHAN Henry | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% |
| 12 | IYER Neil | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 31% | 4% | |
| 13 | HO Anson | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% | 4% | |
| 14 | LEE Nathan Uju | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 26% | 4% | |
| 15 | DOOLEY Atticus | 100% | 98% | 77% | 37% | 8% | 1% | |
| 16 | MINASIAN Mason | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% | |
| 17 | XIAO Brayden | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 13% | 1% | |
| 18 | KOVACHEV Martin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
| 19 | ROH Jaden | 100% | 97% | 73% | 31% | 5% | - | |
| 20 | WONG Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 40% | 9% |
| 21 | LIU Daniel | 100% | 97% | 73% | 31% | 6% | - | |
| 22 | LUC Cedric | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
| 23 | LI Ayden | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 9% | |
| 24 | JOUFFLINEAU Yohann | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 18% | 2% | |
| 25 | KANG Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 32% | |
| 26 | CHEN Cooper | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 27 | CHI Everett | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 28 | LI Cooper | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 13% | 1% | |
| 29 | ROSALES Vincent | 100% | 99% | 84% | 46% | 11% | 1% | |
| 30 | BROWN Andrew | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 31 | SUN Eon | 100% | 71% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | ZENG Vito | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 20% | 3% | |
| 33 | LEE Brian | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 6% | |
| 34 | QI Jeremy | 100% | 92% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 35 | GU Kevin | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 3% | |
| 36 | TANG Morgan | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% | |
| 36 | EKAMBARAM Nikhil | 100% | 98% | 75% | 34% | 7% | 1% | |
| 38 | LI Linze | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% | |
| 39 | WANG Tiger | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 12% | |
| 40 | LI Ryan | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
| 41 | VO Landon | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 17% | 2% | |
| 43 | IRVINE Patrick | 100% | 91% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 44 | YUEN Caleb | 100% | 98% | 79% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 45 | LIU Yijin | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 2% | |
| 46 | HWANG Hagan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 6% | |
| 47 | LEE Alexander | 100% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 48 | SEELMAN Cole | 100% | 96% | 67% | 25% | 4% | - | |
| 49 | VAN ROY Ray | 100% | 97% | 72% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 50 | YANG Jake | 100% | 48% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 51 | GATTO Enzo P. | 100% | 92% | 55% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 52 | BRADIC Andreja | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 52 | KIM Enoch | 100% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 52 | KULKARNI Shreyas | 100% | 36% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 55 | KATZ Nico | 100% | 49% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
| 56 | HAOSONG Oscar | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 57 | NAZIF Laith | 100% | 38% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.