May SJCC

Cadet Women's Épée

Friday, May 16, 2025 at 8:00 AM

Reno-Sparks Convention Center - Reno, NV, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 FRANGER Macy - - 1% 7% 25% 42% 25%
2 OLELE Ifechi 1% 11% 29% 34% 19% 5% 1%
3 LIN Ariel - 1% 6% 22% 37% 27% 8%
3 MERRIMAN Rie 1% 5% 18% 32% 29% 13% 2%
5 WU Michelle - - 2% 11% 31% 38% 18%
6 PRESMAN Aerin - - 3% 14% 33% 35% 14%
7 WANG Chantal 8% 29% 36% 20% 5% 1% -
8 ABUELFUTUH Sama - - 3% 15% 37% 36% 9%
9 MAI Mailan - 1% 10% 28% 36% 20% 4%
10 YILMAZ Pinar - - - 3% 17% 41% 38%
11 ZHUANG Lauren - 3% 15% 32% 33% 15% 2%
12 WANG Ziqi (yoyo) - - - 1% 8% 33% 58%
13 QI Julieanne - 1% 7% 23% 36% 26% 7%
14 CAMAMA Tessa - 1% 5% 19% 35% 31% 10%
15 HABEK Sophia - - 4% 16% 35% 33% 11%
16 KANE Chloe 3% 15% 33% 32% 14% 3% -
17 WANG Chloe - 3% 17% 34% 31% 13% 2%
18 CARRIER Meredith - - 2% 10% 30% 40% 19%
19 XU Yvette - - 1% 7% 25% 42% 25%
20 FLITMAN Gabrielle - 5% 18% 33% 30% 12% 1%
21 CHI Zoe - 4% 20% 39% 29% 8% 1%
22 WONG Caitlin - 1% 10% 30% 38% 18% 2%
23 KAUR Manroop - 2% 11% 28% 35% 21% 4%
24 SCHMITT Harper - - 3% 15% 33% 35% 14%
25 LEE Emily 1% 9% 25% 34% 23% 7% -
26 WANG Jessie - 1% 5% 21% 37% 28% 8%
27 LISCUM Vivian - - 3% 15% 35% 35% 12%
28 GUO Luxi - - - 1% 11% 39% 49%
29 NOVOJILOV Anastasia - 1% 7% 23% 36% 26% 7%
30 IYER Ishana - 2% 11% 27% 34% 21% 5%
31 KUMAR Eva - - 2% 12% 31% 38% 16%
32 XU Amy(Chenyu) 6% 24% 35% 25% 8% 1% -
33 MARTINEZ Christina 1% 6% 21% 34% 27% 10% 1%
34 BALAKRISHNAN Trisha - - 2% 12% 31% 38% 17%
35 XU Serena - 1% 5% 19% 36% 31% 9%
36 BEAVER Ava - - 3% 15% 33% 35% 14%
37 GOLIYAD Lisa 2% 13% 30% 33% 18% 4% -
38 STERR Isabella M. - - 2% 11% 29% 38% 20%
39 SUN Karolyn 4% 19% 35% 29% 11% 2% -
40 GANSER Nicole - 2% 10% 29% 36% 19% 4%
41 HOLDEN Helena - 3% 14% 29% 32% 17% 4%
42 WANG Sophie Y. - 1% 7% 25% 37% 24% 6%
43 PHUKAN Indra - 1% 4% 16% 33% 33% 13%
44 XU Jessica - 2% 12% 31% 35% 17% 3%
45 GAN Shelby 6% 30% 40% 20% 4% - -
46 MYRAH Vivienne - 1% 10% 29% 36% 20% 4%
47 CHERNIS Liah 1% 6% 20% 34% 28% 11% 2%
48 NING Miranda 1% 7% 24% 35% 24% 8% 1%
49 LIN Isabel 1% 13% 34% 33% 15% 3% -
50 WU Jessica - 1% 8% 25% 36% 24% 6%
51 ILYAS Ayah - - 1% 8% 26% 41% 24%
52 MENDOZA zoie - 3% 14% 31% 33% 16% 3%
53 WANG Ailly 33% 42% 20% 4% - - -
54 MISHIMA Audrey - 2% 12% 29% 35% 19% 3%
54 FURMAN Elizabeth 22% 46% 26% 6% 1% - -
56 YOUN Kylie 16% 44% 30% 9% 1% - -
57 LI Anna 21% 39% 28% 10% 2% - -
58 BOROTKO Katerina 1% 10% 32% 35% 17% 4% -
59 HE Anna - 3% 13% 30% 34% 17% 3%
60 KUDRYAVTSEVA Margarita - 1% 6% 24% 38% 25% 6%
61 AIRES Julia 4% 18% 33% 29% 13% 3% -
61 MENG Fina 22% 40% 28% 9% 1% - -
63 YU Chloe 27% 41% 24% 7% 1% - -
64 LI Yunxuan (Joy) 16% 37% 32% 13% 2% - -
65 SUN Hanya - 1% 7% 24% 37% 26% 6%
66 ZHAO Emma 11% 31% 34% 18% 5% 1% -
67 MCQUEEN Morgan 3% 16% 32% 31% 15% 3% -
68 WANG Lihong 7% 29% 36% 21% 6% 1% -
69 CHEN Julia Z. 13% 37% 35% 13% 2% - -
70 GARCIA Aly 9% 29% 34% 20% 6% 1% -
71 LEE Kaitlyn 26% 43% 24% 6% 1% - -
72 FU Shannon 1% 10% 28% 34% 20% 5% 1%
73 FENG Iris 5% 24% 36% 25% 9% 1% -
74 BLANCO Ariia 5% 22% 35% 26% 10% 2% -
75 YUEN Elsie 8% 31% 38% 18% 4% - -
76 LIN Laura 1% 12% 34% 34% 15% 3% -
77 DWIGGINS Reese 6% 26% 36% 23% 7% 1% -
78 ZHU Riley 1% 6% 21% 34% 28% 10% 1%
79 WANG Cecilia 2% 14% 31% 32% 16% 3% -
80 KOU Cynthia 9% 29% 35% 20% 6% 1% -
81 LEE Yeriel 2% 14% 32% 32% 16% 4% -
82 KOHLI Tanvi 14% 36% 33% 14% 3% - -
83 FISCHBEIN Quinley 6% 27% 36% 23% 7% 1% -
84 CHIOU-WILLIAMS Matea 6% 29% 40% 20% 4% - -
85 BUDMAN Ava 9% 37% 36% 15% 3% - -
86 WRIGHT Madison 14% 34% 32% 15% 4% - -
86 YOUN Emily 48% 39% 11% 1% - - -
88 HILL Aurora 57% 35% 7% 1% - - -
89 MAENG Gloria 40% 41% 16% 3% - - -
90 WALLER Sara 40% 42% 15% 3% - - -
91 MADANNAVAR Trisha 36% 44% 16% 3% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.