Indianapolis Fencing Club - Noblesville, IN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | KOENIGSKNECHT Julian | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% |
2 | TURNER Joshua | 1% | 15% | 38% | 35% | 11% | |
3 | REED Dusty (Allen) | - | 11% | 35% | 40% | 14% | |
3 | GUILFORD Corey | 1% | 13% | 38% | 36% | 11% | |
5 | KEIM Spencer | - | 4% | 38% | 45% | 14% | |
6 | MYERS Lewis | 3% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 8% | - |
7 | BELILES Jadon | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 36% | |
8 | MACNEIL Matthew | - | 1% | 32% | 52% | 14% | |
9 | YANG Junhu | 28% | 63% | 8% | - | - | |
10 | YANG Leo | - | 3% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 7% |
11 | STAUBITZ Marc | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
12 | MACNEIL Sydney | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
13 | MULLANIX Carter | 3% | 20% | 40% | 30% | 8% | |
14 | TAGLANG John | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% |
15 | PLUMMER Ken | 64% | 31% | 5% | - | - | |
16 | DUTTON Kimberly | 51% | 40% | 8% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.