Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | XU Ethan | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 2 | SENANI Arjun | D V V V V D | V V V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 3 | TAN Aidan | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
| 3 | TANG Terry | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 5 | SHAO Eric | V V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 6 | LI Aaron | V V V V D V | V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
| 7 | LI Ayren | V D V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 8 | HOU Gaven | D D V D V | V V V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 9 | WANG Rory | V V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 10 | CHENG Logan | V V V D V | V | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 11 | WAYBRIGHT Matteo | V V D V V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 12 | FENG Michael | D V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 13 | XU Nathan | V V D V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 14 | YANG Dylan | V D D V V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 15 | ZHAO Brian | D V V V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 16 | BERETICH Brian | D D V V V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 17 | STAFFORD Gareth | V V V V V | D | 2.7 | 5 | +2.3 |
| 18 | SURESH Rohan | D D V V V V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 19 | ABRAMKIN Tim | V D V D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 20 | GATES Combustion | D V D V V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 21 | SABATINO Patrick | V V V D D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 22 | LI Jayden | V D V V D | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 23 | TIBBETTS Justin | D V V V D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 24 | QIAN Zekai | V V D D V D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 25 | TAM Kyle | V D D D V | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 26 | SFINTESCU Alex | V V D D D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 27 | LAO Kevin | D D D V V | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 28 | JABLOKOV Roman | V D D D D V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 29 | ZHAO Brandon | D V D V D D | V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 30 | JIN Andy | D V D D D | V D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 31 | SHAMBARGER Graham | D D D D D | V D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 32 | BUCOURT Vincent | D D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 33 | CELESTE Ezra | V V D D V D | D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
| 34 | KROLEWSKI Alexander | D V V D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 35 | BRILLANTES Luke | D D V V D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 36 | REN Ryan | V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 37 | KALISH James | V D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 38 | BERNARD Jonathan | D D V D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 39 | HU Daniel | D D D D V D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 40 | DAWSON Myer | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 41 | CHOI Caleb | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 42 | CHENG Andrew | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 43 | MACCIOLI Daniel | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 44 | NG Deacon | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.