Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | XU Ethan | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 76% | |
| 2 | SENANI Arjun | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 23% | 3% |
| 3 | TAN Aidan | - | - | - | - | 4% | 31% | 65% |
| 3 | TANG Terry | - | - | 1% | 14% | 39% | 37% | 9% |
| 5 | SHAO Eric | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 40% | |
| 6 | LI Aaron | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 49% |
| 7 | LI Ayren | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 43% | 9% |
| 8 | HOU Gaven | - | 6% | 29% | 41% | 21% | 3% | |
| 9 | WANG Rory | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 49% | |
| 10 | CHENG Logan | - | - | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% | |
| 11 | WAYBRIGHT Matteo | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
| 12 | FENG Michael | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 41% | |
| 13 | XU Nathan | - | 6% | 27% | 41% | 23% | 4% | |
| 14 | YANG Dylan | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 7% | |
| 15 | ZHAO Brian | - | 3% | 19% | 40% | 32% | 7% | |
| 16 | BERETICH Brian | 2% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
| 17 | STAFFORD Gareth | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% | |
| 18 | SURESH Rohan | - | - | 4% | 24% | 43% | 25% | 4% |
| 19 | ABRAMKIN Tim | - | 6% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 5% | |
| 20 | GATES Combustion | 1% | 10% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 1% | |
| 21 | SABATINO Patrick | 1% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 1% | |
| 22 | LI Jayden | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 23 | TIBBETTS Justin | 1% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 1% | |
| 24 | QIAN Zekai | 1% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 25 | TAM Kyle | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% | |
| 26 | SFINTESCU Alex | 3% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 27 | LAO Kevin | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 2% | |
| 28 | JABLOKOV Roman | 3% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 29 | ZHAO Brandon | - | - | 7% | 34% | 40% | 16% | 2% |
| 30 | JIN Andy | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 5% | |
| 31 | SHAMBARGER Graham | 26% | 44% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | BUCOURT Vincent | 19% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | CELESTE Ezra | 24% | 47% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 34 | KROLEWSKI Alexander | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
| 35 | BRILLANTES Luke | 27% | 45% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
| 36 | REN Ryan | 3% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 9% | - | |
| 37 | KALISH James | 9% | 46% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | BERNARD Jonathan | 23% | 44% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | HU Daniel | 5% | 32% | 48% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | DAWSON Myer | 64% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 41 | CHOI Caleb | 27% | 45% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 42 | CHENG Andrew | 57% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 43 | MACCIOLI Daniel | 41% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 44 | NG Deacon | 72% | 26% | 2% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.