Secaucus, NJ - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MILLETTE Marie Frederique | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 38% |
2 | PATURU Meghana | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 40% |
3 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% |
3 | YANG Miranda (Yinuo) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% |
5 | LIN Katie Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 27% |
6 | GANDHI Sedna S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 35% |
7 | CHEN Zhengnan(Janet) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% |
8 | KHROL Caralina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% |
9 | KIM Diane E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 22% |
10 | FALLON Kyle R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 45% | 9% |
11 | GABERKORN Nadia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 31% |
12 | CHERNYSHOVA Victoria | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
13 | ZHANG Tina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% |
14 | LEE Michelle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 14% |
15 | KIM Elizabeth Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 5% |
16 | GAO Judy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 3% |
17 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
18 | PAN Michelle | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 13% | 1% |
19 | CHIN Isabella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 21% |
20 | DESAI Meera P. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
21 | GU Sarah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 59% | 18% |
22 | SAAL Anna | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
23 | TAYLOR Kiera S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 26% | 3% |
24 | LI Bingqi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 12% |
25 | KUZNETSOV Victoria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 20% |
26 | MEHROTRA Anya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 27% | 5% |
27 | MAO Amy | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - |
28 | XING Carol | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
29 | SUN XiaoQi (Angelica) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
30 | XIAO Ruien | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
31 | YANG Chloe | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 28% | 4% |
32 | JING Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
33 | CHEN Lefu | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 25% | 4% |
34 | LUO Ashley | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
35 | SMUK Daria A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
37 | WU Fan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
38 | XUAN Nicole J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% |
39 | ZHENG Linden | 100% | 99% | 84% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - |
39 | XU Jessic | 100% | 68% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
41 | KNOEPFFLER Andrea V. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
42 | YU Nicole J. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 5% | - |
43 | LEE Yedda | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 14% | 2% |
44 | XU Amy | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
45 | LI Alisha | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - |
46 | BANKULLA Misha R. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - |
47 | BEEM Marin | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - |
48 | CHANG Ella | 100% | 97% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
49 | WITTE Vera | 100% | 93% | 59% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
50 | MIETUS Isabelle | 100% | 94% | 64% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
51 | LU Samantha R. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
51 | MING Cynthia | 100% | 92% | 57% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
53 | JOYAL Anne-Sophie | 100% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
54 | JEAN Olympe G. | 100% | 96% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
55 | YANG Karen | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
56 | ZENG Katrina | 100% | 97% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
57 | LEE Anna | 100% | 86% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
58 | MUELLER Emma M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% | 7% | - |
59 | CHO Claire E. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
60 | KOKES Ava | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
61 | HU Chelsea | 100% | 80% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
62 | KRUMHOLZ Nicole | 100% | 80% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
63 | LI Allison | 100% | 60% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
64 | HARJANI Meher | 100% | 53% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
65 | KEE Bea Isabelle | 100% | 87% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
66 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
67 | MILLARD Lily C. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
68 | BYUN Chelsea | 100% | 87% | 54% | 20% | 4% | 1% | - |
69 | LIU Sheryl | 100% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
70 | HOSANAGAR Inchara | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
72 | LIU Nicole | 100% | 96% | 72% | 31% | 6% | - | - |
73 | SINGH Aayushi | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
74 | KIM Angelina | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
75 | JOSEPH Mikayla | 100% | 38% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
76 | NELSON Grace E. | 100% | 91% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
77 | MAMEDOVA Farah | 100% | 87% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.