Wanglei International Fencing Club - Plainsboro, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ZHANG Jie | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 2 | MAO Benjamin | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
| 3 | CHEN Zhengyang (Allen) | D V V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 3 | CHEN Leonardo | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 5 | ARAVIND Athreya | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
| 6 | MANN Jake R. | V V V V V D | V V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
| 7 | CHEN YiHeng | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 8 | HU Robert J. | V D V D V V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 9 | LI Morgan | V V D D V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 10 | ANAFI Ari | V V V V D D | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 11 | TATE William Isom | D D V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 12 | ZHANG Yujian | D V V V D | V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
| 13 | LEE Henry | D V D D V V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 14 | LI Terence | D V V V D D | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 15 | UPSHAW Micah | D D D V V V | V D | 4.6 | 3 | -1.6 |
| 16 | AKBAY Bora | V D D D V | V V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 17 | DISIMONE David Z. | V D V V V V | D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 18 | CUMMINGS Owen | V D V V D V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 19 | KIM Zac | V V V V D D | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 20 | LI Ryan | V V V V D D | D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
| 21 | NG Nico | V D V D V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 22 | GUMEDELLI Mohnish | D V D D V V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 23 | COETZEE Frans M. | D V V D D V | D | 4.7 | 3 | -1.7 |
| 24 | LOPEZ-SIMPSON Victor | V D V D V D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 25 | SUN Kang | V D D V V D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 26 | LUM-DEBONO Adam | V D D D D V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 27 | GOLIYAD Lisa | D D V D D V | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 28 | YU Livia | D V D D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 29 | LIU Ethan | D D D D D V | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 30 | ANDERSON Riley | D D D D D V | V D | 3.9 | 1 | -2.9 |
| 31 | WANG Eric | D D D D V D | V D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 32 | SUBRAMANIAM Sahil | D D D V D D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 33 | ANDERSON Eric | D D V V D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 34 | LEE Kevin | D V V D D D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 35 | LEE Connor | V D D D D V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 36 | NOOL Alexander | D V V D D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 37 | GAO "George" Xiaojiang | D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 38 | XIE Richard | V D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 39 | TSIEN Richard | V D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 40 | ANDERSON Connor | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 41 | VENKATESAN Harshitha | D D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.