Burlington, NJ - Burlington, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | DUBOIS Lauren N. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 2 | MAREK Sofia | V V D V V | V V V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 3 | VADASZ Ibla P. | V V D V D V | V V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 3 | MIKA Veronica | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 5 | PAUL Lila | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 6 | SOURIMTO Valeria | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 7 | YUN Emma | V V V V D V | V V D | 2.1 | 5 | +2.9 |
| 8 | YUAN Greta | V D V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 9 | ENGELMAN Madeline A. | V V D V V V | V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
| 10 | ADEBANKE Niara | D V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 11 | HILD Nisha | V D V V V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 12 | LEE Sophia | V D V V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 13 | REN Xinling | D V V D V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 14 | NAYAK Anika | V D D V V D | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 15 | FESTA Carina | V V D D V D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 16 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | D V V V D D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 17 | DUCKETT Madison | V D V V D | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 18 | NATH Trisha | V V V D D | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 19 | ANGIOLETTI Kazandra | V D V D V D | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 20 | FEIG Sela | V D D D V V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 21 | HE Lizbeth | D V D V D V | D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 22 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | D V V D D V | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 23 | NG Sarah W. | D V D D V | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 24 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | V D V D D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 25 | MESSICK Maya | D V D V D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 26 | LEUNG Ashlyn K. | V D D V D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 27 | YOUNG Audrey | D D V V D D | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 28 | LI Sophie | D D D D V | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 29 | HUANG Julia | D V D D D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 30 | GUILFOYLE Alanna | D D D D D V | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 31 | XIAO julie | D D V D D D | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 32 | MONTORIO Lily M. | D D D D D | V D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 33 | XU ALINA | D V D D D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 34 | NAYAK Esha | V D D D V D | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 35 | CHOU Zoe | D D D V V D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 36 | GOMERMAN Sophia | D V D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 37 | JAVERI Amaya | D D V D D D | D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
| 38 | PRADO-TUCKER Isabel | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 39 | WU Helen | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.