Burlington, NJ - Burlington, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | DUBOIS Lauren N. | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 40% |
2 | MAREK Sofia | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 44% | 25% | |
3 | VADASZ Ibla P. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 41% | 14% |
3 | MIKA Veronica | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% | |
5 | PAUL Lila | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 43% | 29% |
6 | SOURIMTO Valeria | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 12% |
7 | YUN Emma | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
8 | YUAN Greta | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% | |
9 | ENGELMAN Madeline A. | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 40% | 47% |
10 | ADEBANKE Niara | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 10% | |
11 | HILD Nisha | 2% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 1% | |
12 | LEE Sophia | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
13 | REN Xinling | 4% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
14 | NAYAK Anika | 9% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
15 | FESTA Carina | 3% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
16 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | - | 3% | 18% | 41% | 30% | 7% | - |
17 | DUCKETT Madison | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% | |
18 | NATH Trisha | 9% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | |
19 | ANGIOLETTI Kazandra | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
20 | FEIG Sela | 6% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
21 | HE Lizbeth | - | - | 3% | 14% | 37% | 37% | 9% |
22 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
23 | NG Sarah W. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% | |
24 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 13% | |
25 | MESSICK Maya | 23% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
26 | LEUNG Ashlyn K. | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 1% | |
27 | YOUNG Audrey | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
28 | LI Sophie | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
29 | HUANG Julia | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | |
30 | GUILFOYLE Alanna | 17% | 42% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
31 | XIAO julie | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
32 | MONTORIO Lily M. | 30% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
33 | XU ALINA | 2% | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
34 | NAYAK Esha | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
35 | CHOU Zoe | 2% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - |
36 | GOMERMAN Sophia | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | 1% | |
37 | JAVERI Amaya | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
38 | PRADO-TUCKER Isabel | 16% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
39 | WU Helen | 9% | 36% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.