Burlington, NJ - Burlington, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | RIZKALA Joanna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 14% |
| 2 | MAREK Sofia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 11% |
| 3 | GRINBERG Aliya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 32% | 7% |
| 3 | ALCEBAR Kayla | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 25% | 5% |
| 5 | JIN Olivia P. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 3% |
| 6 | PRIEUR Lauren | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 27% |
| 7 | MIKA Veronica | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
| 8 | BAKER Audrey C. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 2% |
| 9 | LUKASHENKO Angelina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 13% |
| 10 | YUAN Greta | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 7% |
| 11 | DUBOIS Lauren N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 26% |
| 12 | ENGELMAN Madeline A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% |
| 13 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 14 | XIKES Katherine E. | 100% | 83% | 42% | 11% | 1% | < 1% | - |
| 15 | SOURIMTO Valeria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 7% |
| 16 | LEE Sophia | 100% | 99% | 85% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 17 | PROCACCINI Ashten V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 13% |
| 18 | PAUL Lila | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% |
| 19 | SHIH Christina | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
| 20 | GOMERMAN Sophia | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 21 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 29% | 5% |
| 22 | LEUNG Ashlyn K. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 23 | JAVERI Amaya | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 24 | JENKINS Scotland | 100% | 98% | 79% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 25 | MANSPERGER Leena | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 26 | VADASZ Ibla P. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
| 27 | DUCKETT Madison | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 58% | 25% | 5% |
| 28 | ADEBANKE Niara | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 28 | NEIBART Fiona | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 30 | NG Sarah W. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 31 | HILD Nisha | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 32 | DANK Dina | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 33 | LAU Jovana Y. | 100% | 88% | 55% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 34 | YUN Emma | 100% | 90% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 35 | LIN Selena | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | MARKOV Jessica R. | 100% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 37 | REN Xinling | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 38 | HE Xi | 100% | 81% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 39 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | 100% | 68% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 40 | WU Helen | 100% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 41 | MONTORIO Lily M. | 100% | 90% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | MARYASH Samantha | 100% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.