Burlington, NJ - Burlington, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MARX Jackson L. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% |
| 2 | XU Andy P. | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 41% | 16% | |
| 3 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | - | 4% | 16% | 30% | 30% | 16% | 3% |
| 3 | CHEN Kyle P. | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 10% |
| 5 | LIEW Jeremy K. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 3% |
| 6 | ZHEN Ethan | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% | |
| 7 | WONG Jackson | 17% | 43% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 8 | LIU Derek | 5% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 4% | ||
| 9 | KOKES William | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% | ||
| 10 | XU Ethan | 2% | 10% | 25% | 32% | 22% | 8% | 1% |
| 11 | LI Aaron | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 2% |
| 12 | LEE Jonah | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 13 | LEE Brendan | 43% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | ||
| 14 | MALHAM Andrew | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 15 | GUO Justin | 10% | 41% | 39% | 9% | 1% | ||
| 16 | WONG Jacob W. | 2% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 12% | 1% | |
| 17 | LIM Kevin | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
| 18 | BLACK Zachary | 10% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 19 | HONG Logan | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 20 | ZHU Brandan | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 21 | JURMAN Therin | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 22 | SHIM Peter S. | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 22 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 24 | GULCHIN Mark | 1% | 11% | 46% | 37% | 6% | ||
| 25 | HUANG Justin | 8% | 41% | 39% | 12% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.