Burlington, NJ - Burlington, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MARX Jackson L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% |
2 | XU Andy P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 16% | |
3 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 49% | 19% | 3% |
3 | CHEN Kyle P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 38% | 10% |
5 | LIEW Jeremy K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 25% | 3% |
6 | ZHEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 28% | |
7 | WONG Jackson | 100% | 83% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | |
8 | LIU Derek | 100% | 95% | 71% | 30% | 4% | ||
9 | KOKES William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% | ||
10 | XU Ethan | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
11 | LI Aaron | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 19% | 2% |
12 | LEE Jonah | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
13 | LEE Brendan | 100% | 57% | 15% | 2% | - | ||
14 | MALHAM Andrew | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
15 | GUO Justin | 100% | 90% | 48% | 9% | 1% | ||
16 | WONG Jacob W. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 13% | 1% | |
17 | LIM Kevin | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
18 | BLACK Zachary | 100% | 90% | 57% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
19 | HONG Logan | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
20 | ZHU Brandan | 100% | 78% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
21 | JURMAN Therin | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
22 | SHIM Peter S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
22 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
24 | GULCHIN Mark | 100% | 99% | 89% | 43% | 6% | ||
25 | HUANG Justin | 100% | 92% | 52% | 13% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.