Brandeis University - Waltham, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SEREGIN Katya | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 42% | 40% |
| 2 | WANG Zoe | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 44% | 42% |
| 3 | SMUK Alexandra S. | - | - | 3% | 25% | 47% | 25% | |
| 3 | FENG Ge | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 59% | |
| 5 | SPRINGER Sierra | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 79% | |
| 6 | PRIHODKO Nina | - | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 40% | 11% |
| 7 | SONG Angela | - | - | 7% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 4% |
| 8 | YU Nicole J. | - | - | - | 7% | 53% | 39% | |
| 9 | CAFASSO Natalya | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 39% | 51% |
| 10 | CALDWELL Phoebe | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 32% |
| 11 | SMUK Daria A. | - | - | 5% | 25% | 47% | 23% | |
| 12 | GAAFAR Rodaina | - | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% |
| 13 | XU Serena | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 21% |
| 14 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 46% | 38% | |
| 15 | LI Alice | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% | 1% | |
| 16 | BISONO Valentina | 4% | 35% | 42% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 17 | FURMAN Maria | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 43% | 28% |
| 18 | TOLLEY Toby | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% |
| 19 | NOVOJILOV Anastasia | - | - | 6% | 27% | 46% | 19% | 2% |
| 20 | DEPOMMIER-GONZALEZ Isabelle | - | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 8% |
| 21 | SKLAR Davida | 6% | 27% | 43% | 22% | 2% | - | |
| 22 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | - | 3% | 35% | 46% | 16% | ||
| 23 | WANG Sophie Y. | - | 2% | 15% | 40% | 38% | 4% | |
| 24 | LI Fei | - | 1% | 17% | 47% | 34% | ||
| 25 | CHERNOBRIVETS Maria | 7% | 31% | 41% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 26 | ORDORICA Abra | 5% | 35% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 28 | SAVNER Jessica L. | - | - | 3% | 25% | 47% | 25% | |
| 29 | CAMPBELL Anahit M. | - | - | 6% | 36% | 43% | 15% | |
| 30 | SONG Charlotte | 39% | 48% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 31 | SU Evelyn | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 32 | NGUYEN Celena | 3% | 20% | 43% | 27% | 6% | - | - |
| 33 | YU Eva | 1% | 13% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 34 | COVINO Mila | 41% | 42% | 14% | 2% | < 1% | - | |
| 35 | HOAGLAND Sally | - | 8% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 36 | KAUR Manroop | - | 5% | 26% | 44% | 22% | 3% | |
| 37 | DUNNE Jessica | 25% | 45% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 38 | WESER Veronica U. | - | 2% | 29% | 48% | 20% | ||
| 39 | ERSHOVA Anastasia | 3% | 27% | 45% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 40 | GIELEGHEM Klaire | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 3% |
| 41 | ZULUAGA Sofia | - | - | 2% | 12% | 37% | 39% | 10% |
| 42 | WILLIAMSON Beatrix | 1% | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 43 | DRON Lily | - | 2% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 44 | CHOWRIRA Reynah | 27% | 47% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 45 | KLAUSZ Izabella | 8% | 72% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 46 | MONOVA Lilyana | - | 3% | 17% | 40% | 34% | 7% | |
| 47 | FENG Iris | 4% | 24% | 43% | 26% | 2% | - | |
| 48 | CHOY Ida | - | 6% | 26% | 42% | 23% | 3% | |
| 48 | BI Michelle | 8% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 50 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | - | - | < 1% | 5% | 46% | 49% | |
| 51 | MARCHANT Morgan | 6% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 52 | XIAO Katelyn | 8% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | GUO Callista | 6% | 36% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 54 | LI Yixin Catherine | 1% | 7% | 28% | 41% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 55 | BENNETT Olivia | - | 7% | 28% | 43% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 56 | BYRON Karen J. | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% |
| 57 | WITTE Vera | - | - | < 1% | 3% | 21% | 50% | 25% |
| 58 | LIU Ilana | 40% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 59 | ZOU You yang (Yoyo) | 4% | 26% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 60 | MURTALA Aisha | 59% | 38% | 3% | - | - | ||
| 61 | JENSEN MJ | 4% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 7% | - | |
| 62 | MASTRONARDI Laura | 14% | 42% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 63 | MONTOYA Amy C. | - | < 1% | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% |
| 64 | BARMAN Willa | - | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 65 | PHELAN Gabrielle | 2% | 15% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 66 | JONES Brenda L. | - | 1% | 17% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
| 67 | GLOVER Cynthia E. | - | < 1% | 4% | 20% | 43% | 29% | 5% |
| 67 | STOCKTON Catherine | 21% | 47% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 69 | LE NOC’H Farrah | 33% | 46% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 70 | ERIKSEN Kate | 46% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 71 | CARNEY Jennifer | 62% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 72 | QUADRI Saira | 30% | 59% | 10% | 1% | - | ||
| 73 | CUFF Addison | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 74 | SCHAU DeHavilland | 34% | 51% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
| 75 | IVANOV Angela-Sophie | 74% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 76 | DIOH Nicole | 89% | 11% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 77 | MA Yanlei | 38% | 43% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 78 | DANNHAUSER Carol A. | 18% | 42% | 31% | 8% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.