Brandeis University - Waltham, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LIN Maxim | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 2 | MORALES Jonathan | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 3 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 3 | GHAYALOD ansh | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 5 | LAUB William | V V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 6 | PIWOWAR Alex | V V V D V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 7 | CORTEZ Christopher | V D V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 8 | CHENG Brandon | D V V V V D | V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 9 | WITCZAK Mateus | V V V V V | V D | 2.1 | 5 | +2.9 |
| 10 | GONG Jerry | V V V D V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 11 | WANG Daniel | V D V V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 12 | SASSI Ilyas | D D V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 13 | DREYER William | V V V D V D | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 14 | RODRIGUEZ Darlin | D V D V V V | V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 15 | KANG Evan R. | V V D D V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 16 | ZONG Yujie | V D D D D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 17 | KHOTLINE Daniel | V V V V V | D | 1.5 | 5 | +3.5 |
| 18 | WEISS Toby | V V V V D D | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 19 | TOZZI Massimo | V V V D V D | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 20 | BASKIN Isaac | V V V D D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 21 | LEE Damian | V V V D D | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 22 | SWIFT Owen | D V V V D | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 23 | COUNTS Nicholas | D D D V V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 24 | LIU Eric | D V V D D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 25 | ATWOOD Griffin | D D V V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 | |
| 26 | RINALDI Savio | D V D V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 27 | MCMAHON Chris J. | V D D D V | D | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 |
| 28 | WASCO Andrew | D D D V V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 29 | DAI Zihou | D D V V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 30 | WOLMART Zander | D D D V V | V D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 31 | KARAVAS Nicholas | D V D D D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 32 | TORDO Garrett | D V D D D | V D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 33 | EPLETT Nicholas | V D D D D V | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 | |
| 34 | DENG Kenny | V D D D D V | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 35 | CRAWFORD William | D D D V D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 36 | MCCARTHY Devan | V D D D D | D | 3.3 | 1 | -2.3 |
| 37 | HUROWITZ Maxwell | D D D D V | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 | |
| 38 | COOKSON Leonardo | D D V D D D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 | |
| 39 | DZIALO George A. | D D D D V D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 | |
| 40 | MENZIES Liam | D D D D D D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 | |
| 41 | SORENSEN Walker | D D D D D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 | |
| 42 | PODDAR Shameek | D D D D D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 | |
| 43 | AVRAMIS Adam | D D D D D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 | |
| 44 | COURTIN Frederic | D D D D D D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 | |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.