Brandeis University - Waltham, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIN Maxim | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 53% |
| 2 | MORALES Jonathan | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 46% | 31% |
| 3 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 55% | |
| 3 | GHAYALOD ansh | - | - | - | 6% | 47% | 47% | |
| 5 | LAUB William | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 22% | |
| 6 | PIWOWAR Alex | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 23% | |
| 7 | CORTEZ Christopher | - | - | 1% | 9% | 52% | 38% | |
| 8 | CHENG Brandon | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 9 | WITCZAK Mateus | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 10 | GONG Jerry | - | 1% | 13% | 38% | 38% | 9% | |
| 11 | WANG Daniel | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 43% | 28% | |
| 12 | SASSI Ilyas | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 2% |
| 13 | DREYER William | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 14 | RODRIGUEZ Darlin | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 45% | 27% |
| 15 | KANG Evan R. | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 36% | 7% | |
| 16 | ZONG Yujie | 4% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 17 | KHOTLINE Daniel | 8% | 45% | 35% | 10% | 1% | < 1% | |
| 18 | WEISS Toby | 5% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 19 | TOZZI Massimo | - | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 20 | BASKIN Isaac | 1% | 10% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% | |
| 21 | LEE Damian | 16% | 41% | 33% | 9% | - | - | |
| 22 | SWIFT Owen | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 23 | COUNTS Nicholas | 13% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 24 | LIU Eric | 22% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | ATWOOD Griffin | - | 4% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 5% | |
| 26 | RINALDI Savio | 1% | 11% | 38% | 36% | 13% | 2% | |
| 27 | MCMAHON Chris J. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 42% | |
| 28 | WASCO Andrew | 7% | 31% | 42% | 19% | 2% | - | |
| 29 | DAI Zihou | 9% | 35% | 38% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 30 | WOLMART Zander | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | - | - | |
| 31 | KARAVAS Nicholas | 3% | 21% | 42% | 30% | 4% | - | |
| 32 | TORDO Garrett | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% | |
| 33 | EPLETT Nicholas | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 34 | DENG Kenny | - | 6% | 26% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 35 | CRAWFORD William | 43% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 36 | MCCARTHY Devan | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | |
| 37 | HUROWITZ Maxwell | 3% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 38 | COOKSON Leonardo | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 39 | DZIALO George A. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | - |
| 40 | MENZIES Liam | 48% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 41 | SORENSEN Walker | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 42 | PODDAR Shameek | 27% | 45% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
| 43 | AVRAMIS Adam | 73% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 44 | COURTIN Frederic | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.