BEAVERTON, OR - BEAVERTON, OR, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | MUSHA John M. | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 11% |
2 | STRUGAR Marcus A. | - | 3% | 20% | 45% | 32% | |
3 | PHILLIPS Konon | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% | |
3 | SKYWARK Andrew | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
5 | BERK Theodore | 1% | 8% | 32% | 43% | 17% | |
6 | JIN Honggu | 1% | 11% | 41% | 38% | 9% | |
7 | PHILLIPS Jasper | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 17% |
8 | JONES Bryan T. | 31% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | |
9 | MAKO Kieran | 5% | 30% | 42% | 20% | 3% | |
10 | KIM Jackson | 2% | 17% | 41% | 32% | 8% | |
11 | FERRARI Giovanni | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - |
12 | BOSELEY Owen | 40% | 45% | 13% | 1% | - | |
13 | DEMEAUX Gregory | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
14 | DRUMHELLER H. Weston | 9% | 32% | 40% | 18% | 2% | |
15 | MCCARTHY Seamus | 23% | 54% | 20% | 2% | - | |
16 | DAVIS Daniel | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.