Brandeis University - Waltham, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | LIU Jaelyn A. | - | - | - | - | 15% | 84% |
| 2 | JING Emily | - | - | - | - | 8% | 92% |
| 3 | SHEN Lydia | - | - | 1% | 12% | 53% | 34% |
| 3 | AMR HOSSNY Sara | - | - | - | 5% | 32% | 63% |
| 5 | YANG Emma | - | - | - | 3% | 53% | 43% |
| 6 | WANG YIRAN | - | - | - | 7% | 45% | 48% |
| 7 | SEO Irene Y. | - | - | 1% | 21% | 68% | 10% |
| 8 | SHEN Emilia | - | - | 1% | 12% | 53% | 34% |
| 9 | CHO Emily (Euran) | - | - | 1% | 25% | 49% | 24% |
| 10 | YANG Iris | - | - | - | 11% | 51% | 38% |
| 11 | LI Eleanor | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 39% | 13% |
| 12 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | - | - | 1% | 9% | 45% | 45% |
| 13 | MI Aileen | - | - | - | 10% | 49% | 41% |
| 13 | SHENG Katherine | - | 2% | 13% | 38% | 36% | 10% |
| 15 | CHEN Renee | - | - | - | 2% | 46% | 51% |
| 16 | ZHENG Julie | - | - | 7% | 41% | 49% | 2% |
| 17 | ESTEBAN Maxine Isabel | - | - | 8% | 35% | 42% | 14% |
| 18 | LI Shuang | - | 1% | 12% | 40% | 40% | 8% |
| 19 | FENG Audrey | - | 1% | 18% | 53% | 27% | 1% |
| 20 | ZELDIN Nadia | 2% | 19% | 44% | 31% | 4% | - |
| 21 | RENTON Samantha | - | - | 1% | 21% | 50% | 29% |
| 22 | SHA Yi Ling | - | 3% | 22% | 45% | 27% | 3% |
| 23 | HAO Danica | - | 2% | 21% | 60% | 16% | - |
| 24 | MANGLANI Maya | 16% | 49% | 29% | 6% | - | - |
| 25 | LIU Angel(Daying) | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 33% |
| 26 | WANG Jasmine | - | - | 11% | 60% | 26% | 3% |
| 27 | PUOPOLO Mia | 3% | 50% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 28 | VERDESOTO Maria Jose | 2% | 17% | 40% | 34% | 6% | - |
| 29 | ZHOU Sophia | 13% | 39% | 36% | 11% | - | - |
| 30 | LI Savannah | - | 21% | 54% | 22% | 2% | - |
| 31 | SULLIVAN Red | 6% | 28% | 43% | 22% | 1% | - |
| 32 | LAO Sophia | - | 18% | 67% | 14% | 1% | - |
| 33 | GOODMAN Carden | 7% | 72% | 21% | 1% | - | - |
| 34 | MEYER Claudia | 1% | 14% | 48% | 32% | 5% | - |
| 35 | POLING Katherine | 64% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 36 | POWLEDGE Cora | 1% | 23% | 59% | 17% | 1% | - |
| 37 | ZINITI-LAU Elena | 21% | 54% | 23% | 3% | - | - |
| 38 | BERTOLINI Mia | 7% | 31% | 42% | 19% | 1% | - |
| 39 | MULLER Amara | 30% | 49% | 20% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | CHEN Sophie | 2% | 20% | 44% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 41 | IREZ Lyra | 27% | 44% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 42 | SHANG Arianna | 36% | 46% | 16% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | WANG Chloe | - | 14% | 45% | 32% | 8% | - |
| 43 | SFINTESCU Emma | 4% | 57% | 35% | 5% | - | - |
| 45 | WATSON Evelyn | 8% | 36% | 46% | 10% | - | - |
| 46 | ZAMLYNNY Maya | 6% | 37% | 41% | 15% | 1% | - |
| 47 | SHUTZER Lily | 7% | 62% | 29% | 2% | - | - |
| 48 | CHUNG Stella | 34% | 48% | 17% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | ERSHOVA Anastasia | 52% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | WILBERT Gwendolyn (Gwen) A. | 2% | 21% | 44% | 29% | 3% | - |
| 51 | CARDENTE Gwendolyn | 89% | 11% | - | - | - | - |
| 52 | BURNHAM Clarice | 94% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 52 | KOPACZ Lindsay | 92% | 8% | - | - | - | - |
| 54 | FENTON Barbara R. | 86% | 13% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.