Brandeis University - Waltham, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LIU Jaelyn A. | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 2 | JING Emily | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 3 | SHEN Lydia | V V V D V | V V V | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 3 | AMR HOSSNY Sara | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 5 | YANG Emma | V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 6 | WANG YIRAN | V D V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 7 | SEO Irene Y. | V V V V D | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 8 | SHEN Emilia | V D D V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 9 | CHO Emily (Euran) | V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 10 | YANG Iris | V V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 11 | LI Eleanor | V V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 12 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | D V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 13 | MI Aileen | V D V V V | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 13 | SHENG Katherine | V V V D V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 15 | CHEN Renee | V V D V V | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 16 | ZHENG Julie | V D D V V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 17 | ESTEBAN Maxine Isabel | V V V D V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 18 | LI Shuang | V V V D V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 19 | FENG Audrey | D V V V V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 20 | ZELDIN Nadia | V V D V V | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 21 | RENTON Samantha | V V D V D | D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 22 | SHA Yi Ling | V V D V D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 23 | HAO Danica | V D V D V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 24 | MANGLANI Maya | D V V V D | V D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
| 25 | LIU Angel(Daying) | D D D V V | V D | 4.1 | 2 | -2.1 |
| 26 | WANG Jasmine | D V V D D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 27 | PUOPOLO Mia | D D V D V | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 28 | VERDESOTO Maria Jose | D V V D D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 29 | ZHOU Sophia | D D V D V | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 30 | LI Savannah | D V V D D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 31 | SULLIVAN Red | D D D V D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 32 | LAO Sophia | D D D V D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 33 | GOODMAN Carden | V V D D V | D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
| 34 | MEYER Claudia | V V D V D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 35 | POLING Katherine | D D V V D | D | 0.4 | 2 | +1.6 |
| 36 | POWLEDGE Cora | D D V D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 37 | ZINITI-LAU Elena | V D D D V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 38 | BERTOLINI Mia | V V D D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 39 | MULLER Amara | D V D D V | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 40 | CHEN Sophie | V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 41 | IREZ Lyra | D D V D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 42 | SHANG Arianna | D D V D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 43 | WANG Chloe | D D D V D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 43 | SFINTESCU Emma | V D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 45 | WATSON Evelyn | D D D V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 | |
| 46 | ZAMLYNNY Maya | D V D D D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 | |
| 47 | SHUTZER Lily | D D D V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 | |
| 48 | CHUNG Stella | D D D D D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 | |
| 48 | ERSHOVA Anastasia | D D D D D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 | |
| 50 | WILBERT Gwendolyn (Gwen) A. | D D D D D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 | |
| 51 | CARDENTE Gwendolyn | D D D D D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 | |
| 52 | BURNHAM Clarice | D D D D D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 | |
| 52 | KOPACZ Lindsay | D D D D D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 | |
| 54 | FENTON Barbara R. | D D D D D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 | |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.