Still Point Fencing - Tucson, AZ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | VENET Téva | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 46% | |
| 2 | MANDEL Christian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 14% |
| 3 | COLE Perrin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
| 3 | WILLIAMS Timothy | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 33% | 5% | |
| 5 | ORELUP Austin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% | 5% | |
| 6 | FERNANDEZ Tomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 37% |
| 7 | LAURSEN Logan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 20% | 2% |
| 8 | FESTIN Michael G. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 9% | 1% |
| 9 | SARMIENTO Luke | 100% | 99% | 89% | 65% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 10 | PABLO Sebastian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 17% | |
| 11 | SAUCEDO Grecia | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 15% | 2% | |
| 12 | SCHWENK Cody D. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% | 10% | 1% |
| 13 | HOWIE Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 37% | 9% |
| 14 | SANDIRI Shanmukh Rishith | 100% | 92% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 15 | BLUM Chaston | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 16 | PABLO Jesse | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 37% | 4% | |
| 17 | SYPES Michael A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 17% |
| 18 | PYE Emily | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 19 | CELJO Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 46% | 9% | |
| 20 | TAARIQ Tanisha | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 21 | WELLING Cohen | 100% | 96% | 65% | 19% | 2% | - | |
| 22 | MARIKOS Christina | 100% | 72% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 23 | WELLING Michael | 100% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 24 | PHILLIPS Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% |
| 25 | CUEVAS Tom | 100% | 98% | 79% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 26 | ANDERSON Donald | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 27 | SMITH Samuel J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 28 | BRANDT Jacob | 100% | 98% | 58% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | COIMBATORE Dillon | 100% | 99% | 88% | 37% | 6% | - | - |
| 30 | RANKIN Kent | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 3% |
| 31 | FELDMAN Louis | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 32 | HARTMAN Gunnar | 100% | 51% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 33 | RAJPRABHU Pranesh | 100% | 37% | 5% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.