Tennnessee Recreation Center for Students - Knoxville, TN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PARCELEWICZ John M. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
| 2 | CRANE Matthew T. | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 3 | WEBSTER Davis G. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 44% | 23% |
| 3 | SELF Mark A. | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 36% | 8% | < 1% |
| 5 | BOGART Drake R. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% |
| 6 | CILENTI Maria | 1% | 5% | 18% | 30% | 29% | 14% | 3% |
| 7 | MATTSON Rachel | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 8 | YOHANON Jether | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 9 | MCGRATH Russell D. | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 10 | MIDDEKE Devin | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 11 | LEE Hunter | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 12 | STANCZAK Niall | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 13 | BAIONE Stephanie R. | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 14 | WHITLEY Gary L. | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 16 | RICKMAN II Samuel B. | 4% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 18 | OTERO Dante | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 19 | COPELAND Raymond | 1% | 5% | 19% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 20 | WHITTEN Daniel | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
| 21 | CLAPP Ian | 3% | 15% | 30% | 30% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 22 | BERNART Katharine | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 24 | SHELANDER Connor | 16% | 41% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 25 | LILLISTON Ian | 1% | 8% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 25 | CHUMNEY Ben | 7% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 27 | MIRSAIDOVA Azizakhon | 19% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 28 | ADAMS Noah | 8% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.