Baird Center - Milwaukee, WI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GROSS Liran | - | - | - | - | - | 18% | 81% |
| 2 | PAI Dong-Ying | - | - | - | 2% | 25% | 74% | |
| 3 | JAN Stephen | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 67% | 12% |
| 3 | MORENO BRIONES Patricio A. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 95% | |
| 5 | BERBERI Matt | 2% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 6% | < 1% | |
| 6 | KUZMAK Michael J. | 1% | 11% | 35% | 42% | 11% | ||
| 7 | GLOZMAN Pasha | - | - | 5% | 29% | 54% | 12% | |
| 8 | WOOD Alexander W. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 37% | |
| 9 | KREIDMAN Michael J. | - | - | - | 4% | 91% | 5% | |
| 10 | TOMASI John | 6% | 30% | 43% | 19% | 2% | ||
| 11 | PASHBY Stephen N. | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 37% | 10% | |
| 12 | BHATT Jay | 1% | 10% | 42% | 39% | 9% | - | |
| 13 | DUANE Michael | 18% | 43% | 31% | 8% | - | ||
| 14 | MILLER Douglas S. | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 56% | ||
| 15 | CARRINO David | 5% | 27% | 41% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 16 | CROWE Nathan | 20% | 54% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
| 17 | RODRIGUEZ VINCENT | 4% | 25% | 45% | 24% | - | - | |
| 18 | MA Yi | 1% | 20% | 41% | 30% | 7% | - | - |
| 19 | BABER Ijlal | 4% | 23% | 45% | 27% | 1% | - | |
| 20 | MCGINTY Eli G. | - | 12% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 2% | |
| 21 | CLIPPARD Erik J. | 3% | 22% | 42% | 28% | 5% | - | - |
| 22 | FROST Talon | 33% | 46% | 19% | 3% | - | ||
| 23 | MCCONKEY Eric | - | 9% | 38% | 42% | 10% | - | |
| 24 | PHO Eric | - | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 2% | |
| 25 | MARTZ Michael | 81% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 26 | FRASER Justin | 28% | 45% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 27 | HOLCOMB Michael | 58% | 35% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 28 | DERBY Joshua (Josh) C. | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 46% | 8% | - |
| 29 | WILLIAMS Brian | 59% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 31 | CHANDLEE Thomas | 22% | 46% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.