Baird Center - Milwaukee, WI, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | XU Sevilla | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 88% |
| 2 | YANG Olivia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 44% | 3% |
| 3 | CHAN Jolene | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% |
| 3 | LUO lucy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 42% |
| 5 | FRASER Morgan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% |
| 5 | ZHU Alivia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 38% |
| 7 | KIM Yuna | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 40% | ||
| 8 | ZHENG Annalyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% |
| 9 | JOO Sara | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% |
| 10 | CHEN Rachel Roujia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 80% |
| 11 | CHEN Summer | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 29% | |
| 12 | ZHU Audrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 22% |
| 13 | QIAO Lori-Ann | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 25% |
| 14 | CHEN Hannah Rouhui | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 27% |
| 15 | SMIRNOV Victoria | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 10% |
| 16 | MCCLAIN Madison | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 20% | 2% |
| 17 | BYK Karalina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% |
| 18 | ZHAN Catherine | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 4% |
| 19 | KHETPAL Aalia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% |
| 20 | SHEN Gloria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% |
| 21 | XING Melly | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 76% | |
| 22 | LI Annabelle | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 13% | |
| 23 | LIN Clara | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
| 24 | KIM Ines | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 4% |
| 25 | ZHANG Selina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% |
| 26 | ENRIQUEZ Bianca Perla | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 50% |
| 27 | CHENG Audrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 32% |
| 28 | ELLISON Ingrid | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% |
| 29 | MILLER Anna | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 5% |
| 30 | SHI Cathy | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
| 31 | FAN Lauren | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
| 32 | CHEUNG Carabelle | 100% | 90% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 33 | CULLIVAN Elise | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
| 34 | PAEK Ellie | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 23% | 3% | |
| 35 | MAHAPATRA Alisha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 4% |
| 36 | HUANG Emma | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 12% |
| 37 | LAM Dorris Yandor | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 3% |
| 38 | CHUNG Charlotte | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 29% | 2% |
| 39 | ZHANG Annabelle | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 28% | 1% |
| 40 | VALOUEVA Katerina | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 7% | - |
| 41 | JU Victoria | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 52% | 7% | |
| 42 | LIU Bella | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 43 | WANG Joann | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% |
| 44 | SAVIOZ Naomi | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 45 | PEROJO Angie | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 46 | ARUNKISHORE Dakshina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% |
| 47 | MCCLAIN Grayce | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 15% | 1% |
| 48 | WEN Lillian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% |
| 49 | TATINENI Charvi | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 8% | - |
| 50 | NAKAZATO Isabella | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
| 51 | KO Adeline | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 9% | 1% |
| 52 | DONG Audrey | 100% | 100% | 92% | 57% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 53 | JAZWINSKI Ivy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 28% | |
| 54 | ZHOU Athena | 100% | 98% | 75% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 56 | KHANAL Sarah | 100% | 97% | 75% | 34% | 6% | ||
| 57 | FENG Christy | 100% | 94% | 67% | 27% | 4% | - | |
| 58 | DOMINIK Eliana | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 27% | 4% | - |
| 59 | LUO Olivia | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 60 | CLOUD Chrystie | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 61 | HWANG Carolina | 100% | 96% | 76% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 62 | HOLSTAD Anneliese | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 63 | KENT Audrey | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 64 | CHAN Jaclyn | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 65 | KASHUBA Mila | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 11% |
| 66 | ELNAGGAR lea | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 67 | POON Taylor | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | < 1% | - |
| 68 | LIU Anya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 32% | |
| 69 | YOUN Davina | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 15% | 1% |
| 69 | KIM Rylie | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% | - |
| 71 | XU Alisa | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 20% | 2% |
| 72 | LAI Olivia | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 7% | - |
| 73 | BAX Mila | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 74 | LALONDE Beatrice | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 75 | FAROOQI Eliora | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 17% | 2% | |
| 76 | HUANG Jiayu | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 9% | ||
| 77 | SHU Kayla | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
| 78 | YAO Emma | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 10% | |
| 79 | HO Avery | 100% | 94% | 54% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 80 | XU Selina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 63% | 19% | 1% |
| 81 | DING Jessica | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 82 | KIM Lael | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 19% | 2% |
| 83 | XU Elaina | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 84 | LI Annabelle | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 20% | 2% |
| 85 | SAIFEE Sakina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 35% | 3% |
| 86 | CHAN Chloe | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 1% |
| 87 | LUXIEO Cathy | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 88 | KAGAN Natalie | 100% | 99% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 89 | SHIN Ellie | 100% | 52% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 90 | FANG Savannah | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 91 | ZHANG Katie | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 6% | - | |
| 92 | LI Beatrice | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 4% | |
| 93 | LIU Mia | 100% | 100% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 4% | |
| 94 | JONES Parker | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% | |
| 95 | HUFFMAN Seraphina | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 96 | XU Scarlett | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 96 | ZHENG Joanna | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 13% | - |
| 98 | TANG Clementine | 100% | 86% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 99 | TAGNE Zoey | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 100 | LOPUS Marlena | 100% | 71% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 101 | WELTER Gemma | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 102 | SUI Jessie | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 103 | YEN Kayleigh | 100% | 85% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 104 | TELEB Amina | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 105 | KLIVANS Gwyneth | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 106 | LEE Madison | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 107 | ZHANG Norah | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 108 | KANASZ Peyton | 100% | 82% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 109 | TEOH Kaylee | 100% | 79% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 109 | GONZALEZ Alexandra | 100% | 93% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 111 | LI Claire | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 112 | LI Claire | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 112 | WALSH Ardella | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 114 | CLOUD Cailynn | 100% | 95% | 70% | 28% | 5% | - | - |
| 115 | LEE Annabel | 100% | 90% | 52% | 15% | 2% | ||
| 116 | WANG Manny | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 35% | 7% | |
| 117 | ZHU Alicia | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 118 | GANOCY Sloane | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 119 | GU Alexandra | 100% | 88% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 120 | DONG CAROLINE | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 121 | FONG Isabel | 100% | 78% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 122 | WEST Mira | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 122 | GISZCZAK Emma | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 124 | WANG Sally | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 1% |
| 125 | CAMPOS-URQUIJO Emilia | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 126 | SUN Leia | 100% | 83% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 127 | MA Laurie | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 128 | JIANG Arwen | 100% | 90% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 129 | SCHOR Katherine | 100% | 67% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 130 | LIU Doris | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 131 | CHO Yuna | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 132 | LI Catherine | 100% | 82% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 133 | ZMUDA Jordan | 100% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 134 | WU Karina | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 135 | WANG Kelly | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 136 | CURRIER-BLAGG Bryn | 100% | 79% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 137 | ROLKOWSKI Mia | 100% | 72% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 138 | HALLEY Jacqueline | 100% | 98% | 84% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 139 | JAGANNATHAN Aria | 100% | 66% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 140 | CABBINESS CLAIRE | 100% | 95% | 67% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 141 | SCHULTZ Emmi | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 141 | KIM Lisel | 100% | 89% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 143 | KASHUBA Adriana | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 144 | WILKINS Aviella | 100% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | ||
| 144 | HSU Courtney | 100% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 146 | ZEE Bella | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 146 | KOCHER Lillian | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 148 | BROWN Juliette | 100% | 80% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 149 | ZHANG Elizabeth | 100% | 75% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 150 | LAWLOR Ailis | 100% | 87% | 46% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 150 | DUBOISKAYA Sofia | 100% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 152 | CHOI Mackenzie | 100% | 59% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 152 | DUBOK Vasilisa | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 154 | LAHR Amelia | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 8% | - |
| 155 | MORONES Alieza | 100% | 51% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 156 | SANCHEZ-BOROVSKAYA Snezhana | 100% | 78% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.