Belleville High School - Belleville, MI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BROOKS Zachary B. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% | 
| 2 | KANAR Ian | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 44% | 40% | 
| 3 | JONES Reilly | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% | |
| 3 | SERAFYM Damian | - | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 36% | 7% | 
| 5 | KIM Sterling S. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 40% | 34% | 8% | 
| 6 | MCDONNELL Michael | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% | |
| 7 | CAMP Ethan | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 4% | 
| 8 | BECKER Thomas | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% | 
| 9 | SNELL Andrew J. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 16% | 
| 10 | SCHRANK Mitchell | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% | |
| 11 | TOWNSEND George | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% | |
| 12 | LI Peizhen (Daniel) | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
| 13 | DEPAUW Devan | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 5% | |
| 14 | BETTS Jr Anthony P. | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | 
| 15 | MARSHALL John W. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 40% | 51% | |
| 16 | JOBE Connor | 2% | 17% | 40% | 33% | 7% | - | |
| 17 | SCHULTZ Gillian | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - | 
| 18 | DIETZ Tommy | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
| 19 | OCHS Bradley C. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | 
| 20 | ALABI Azryl | 20% | 43% | 30% | 7% | - | - | |
| 21 | NORCONK Claire R. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% | |
| 22 | SAYLOR Henry | 9% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | - | 
| 23 | ECKEL Anson J. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 49% | 13% | 
| 24 | BROWN Amanda | - | 3% | 23% | 49% | 22% | 3% | - | 
| 25 | LAPP J P | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | 
| 26 | RODACHY Jeffrey M. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 7% | |
| 27 | SHELVEN Jr. Lawrence E. | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
| 28 | AYAR Riley | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 29 | SCHULTZ Michelle M. | 26% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - | 
| 30 | ADAM Cristian | 1% | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% | 
| 31 | WALSH Christopher J. | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% | 1% | 
| 32 | METZ Evan | 25% | 46% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
| 33 | ZHANG James | - | - | 3% | 19% | 49% | 26% | 3% | 
| 34 | BOLAKOWSKI John M. | - | 2% | 16% | 49% | 29% | 4% | |
| 35 | DEPAUW Adeline | 6% | 33% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - | - | 
| 36 | JANYSKA Allen | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 37 | SAYLOR Nathaniel | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
| 38 | ZHANG Michael | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 5% | |
| 39 | ADAMISIN Brayden | 2% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 40 | LIU Quincy | 1% | 9% | 40% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | 
| 41 | WANG Kaiyan | 18% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 42 | CACCAMO Nicholas | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 32% | 5% | - | 
| 43 | OXIE Matthew | 11% | 43% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - | - | 
| 44 | STAUBITZ Marc | 2% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 12% | 1% | - | 
| 45 | APANASEWICZ Dan | 22% | 39% | 28% | 9% | 2% | - | |
| 46 | KLINE R. Jay | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
| 48 | WILTSE Alexander | 4% | 27% | 42% | 22% | 5% | - | - | 
| 49 | KOCSIS Cherry | 46% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - | 
| 50 | HOLDORF LE GOFF Bianca | 6% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 51 | ZEHE Michele A. | 34% | 43% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - | 
| 52 | JAGROO Mary | 10% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | - | 
| 53 | DUTTON Kimberly | 65% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | - | 
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.