Belleville High School - Belleville, MI, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BROOKS Zachary B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% |
| 2 | KANAR Ian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 40% |
| 3 | JONES Reilly | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% | |
| 3 | SERAFYM Damian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 7% |
| 5 | KIM Sterling S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 42% | 8% |
| 6 | MCDONNELL Michael | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% | |
| 7 | CAMP Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 4% |
| 8 | BECKER Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% |
| 9 | SNELL Andrew J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 16% |
| 10 | SCHRANK Mitchell | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% | |
| 11 | TOWNSEND George | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% | |
| 12 | LI Peizhen (Daniel) | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 8% | |
| 13 | DEPAUW Devan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 5% | |
| 14 | BETTS Jr Anthony P. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 15 | MARSHALL John W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 51% | |
| 16 | JOBE Connor | 100% | 98% | 80% | 40% | 7% | - | |
| 17 | SCHULTZ Gillian | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 18 | DIETZ Tommy | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 9% | |
| 19 | OCHS Bradley C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 5% |
| 20 | ALABI Azryl | 100% | 80% | 37% | 7% | - | - | |
| 21 | NORCONK Claire R. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% | |
| 22 | SAYLOR Henry | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 23 | ECKEL Anson J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 13% |
| 24 | BROWN Amanda | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 25% | 3% | - |
| 25 | LAPP J P | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 26 | RODACHY Jeffrey M. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 7% | |
| 27 | SHELVEN Jr. Lawrence E. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 28 | AYAR Riley | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 29 | SCHULTZ Michelle M. | 100% | 74% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | ADAM Cristian | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 31 | WALSH Christopher J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 15% | 1% |
| 32 | METZ Evan | 100% | 75% | 29% | 5% | - | - | |
| 33 | ZHANG James | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 29% | 3% |
| 34 | BOLAKOWSKI John M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 33% | 4% | |
| 35 | DEPAUW Adeline | 100% | 94% | 60% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 36 | JANYSKA Allen | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 37 | SAYLOR Nathaniel | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 38 | ZHANG Michael | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% | |
| 39 | ADAMISIN Brayden | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
| 40 | LIU Quincy | 100% | 99% | 90% | 50% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 41 | WANG Kaiyan | 100% | 82% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 42 | CACCAMO Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 38% | 6% | - |
| 43 | OXIE Matthew | 100% | 88% | 46% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 44 | STAUBITZ Marc | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 14% | 1% | - |
| 45 | APANASEWICZ Dan | 100% | 76% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 46 | KLINE R. Jay | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% | |
| 48 | WILTSE Alexander | 100% | 96% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 49 | KOCSIS Cherry | 100% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 50 | HOLDORF LE GOFF Bianca | 100% | 94% | 66% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
| 51 | ZEHE Michele A. | 100% | 66% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 52 | JAGROO Mary | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 53 | DUTTON Kimberly | 100% | 35% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.