Belleville High School - Belleville, MI, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | LIU Ethan | V D V V V V | V V V V V | 5.7 | 5 | -0.7 |
2 | ASHIDA Tomoaki | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
3 | GATRELL Mitchell E. | V V V D V | V V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
3 | KANAR Ian | D V V V D | V V V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
5 | COOPER Piper W. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
6 | LU Alex | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
7 | NAZARIO Dominic | V V V V V D | V V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
8 | LEE Ian | D V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
9 | HAMILTON Brock B. | V V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
10 | ARATA Connor | V V V V V | V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
11 | HARRIS Parker | V D V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
12 | COPELAND Nigel | D V V V V D | V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
13 | WU Benjamin (Ben) | D V V V D V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
14 | FERENCZ Alexander J. | V D D D V V | V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
15 | XIONG Isabel | V D V V D D | V V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
16 | EDWARDS Connor | V D D D V | V V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
17 | CHO Michael | V D V V V V | D | 5.6 | 5 | -0.6 |
18 | TOWNE Benjamin | V V V D V V | D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
19 | MCGRATH Polina S. | D V V V V V | D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
20 | MAVANI Krishna | V V V D V D | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
21 | PECKENS Tyler | V V D D V V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
22 | BECKER Thomas | V V D V D V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
23 | DIEPSTRA Jeremy | V V D V D D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
24 | STONE Sydney | D D D V V V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
25 | COSSROW Alex | D V V D V D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
26 | YEE Michael | D D V D V | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
27 | STORER Alexander | D V V D D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
28 | KOMEYA Ohna | D D V V D D | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
29 | BELL Scott | D D D V V D | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
30 | ALABI Adriel | V V D D D D | V D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
31 | HUANG Natalie | D D D D D V | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
32 | CHENG Emily | D D D D V D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
33 | ZMUDA Aiden | D D V V V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
34 | ATKINSON Josiah | D D D V V V | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
35 | AN Jasmine N. | V V D D D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
36 | SIMONS Henry | V D D D D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
37 | METZ Evan | D D V D D V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
38 | DRIVER Atticus | D D D V D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
39 | DENG Albert | V D D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
40 | FLOYD John | V D D D D | D | 0.1 | 1 | +0.9 |
41 | ALABI Azryl | D V D D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
42 | ADAM Cristian | V D D D D D | D | 3.3 | 1 | -2.3 |
43 | FOLIO Isabella | D D D V D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
44 | KYLMAN Andrew | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
45 | HENSEL Cameron | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
46 | CHENG Nathan | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
47 | HENSEL Mark | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.