Belleville High School - Belleville, MI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIU Ethan | - | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 71% |
| 2 | ASHIDA Tomoaki | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 3 | GATRELL Mitchell E. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 45% | 38% | |
| 3 | KANAR Ian | - | - | 6% | 29% | 46% | 20% | |
| 5 | COOPER Piper W. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 59% |
| 6 | LU Alex | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 49% | 10% |
| 7 | NAZARIO Dominic | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 8 | LEE Ian | - | - | 4% | 23% | 48% | 24% | |
| 9 | HAMILTON Brock B. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 45% | 39% | |
| 10 | ARATA Connor | - | 2% | 22% | 46% | 27% | 4% | |
| 11 | HARRIS Parker | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
| 12 | COPELAND Nigel | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 43% | 13% |
| 13 | WU Benjamin (Ben) | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 14 | FERENCZ Alexander J. | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 15 | XIONG Isabel | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 16 | EDWARDS Connor | 1% | 9% | 33% | 41% | 15% | 2% | |
| 17 | CHO Michael | - | - | - | - | 5% | 32% | 63% |
| 18 | TOWNE Benjamin | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 19 | MCGRATH Polina S. | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 20 | MAVANI Krishna | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
| 21 | PECKENS Tyler | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
| 22 | BECKER Thomas | - | 1% | 4% | 19% | 39% | 32% | 5% |
| 23 | DIEPSTRA Jeremy | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
| 24 | STONE Sydney | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 25 | COSSROW Alex | - | 4% | 21% | 42% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 26 | YEE Michael | - | 4% | 40% | 41% | 14% | 1% | |
| 27 | STORER Alexander | 1% | 15% | 42% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 28 | KOMEYA Ohna | 26% | 46% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 29 | BELL Scott | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 1% |
| 30 | ALABI Adriel | 31% | 49% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 31 | HUANG Natalie | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 32 | CHENG Emily | 9% | 36% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | ZMUDA Aiden | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 34 | ATKINSON Josiah | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 41% | 13% | 1% |
| 35 | AN Jasmine N. | 7% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 36 | SIMONS Henry | 6% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 37 | METZ Evan | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 38 | DRIVER Atticus | 19% | 45% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | DENG Albert | 48% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 40 | FLOYD John | 95% | 5% | - | - | - | - | |
| 41 | ALABI Azryl | 1% | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 42 | ADAM Cristian | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 43 | FOLIO Isabella | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 44 | KYLMAN Andrew | 2% | 81% | 16% | 1% | - | - | |
| 45 | HENSEL Cameron | 2% | 32% | 51% | 15% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | CHENG Nathan | 15% | 40% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | HENSEL Mark | 23% | 50% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.