The Fencing Center of San Jose - San Jose, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LIU Aiden | V V D V V | V V V V V | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 2 | SUN Lucas | V V V D D | V V V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 3 | PAN Samantha | D V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 3 | KHANAL Sarah | V D D V V | V V V D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
| 5 | ALVAREZ Francisco Janusz | V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 6 | SHENOY Neil | V V V D V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 7 | LIN Dylan | D V V V V | V V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 8 | WANG Theodore | V D V V D | V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 9 | KIM Rylie | V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 10 | LAM Dorris Yandor | V V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 11 | SITU Baiqin | V V V V D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 12 | ZHANG Katie Qingyun | V V V D V | V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 13 | LAI Olivia | V D V V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 14 | LI Lief | D D V V V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 15 | CREMEL Remi | V V V D D | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 16 | SUN Suri | D D V D V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 17 | ZHU Claire | V V V D V | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 18 | GOWDA Adisha | D V V D V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 19 | HONDA Emi | V V D V D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 20 | SHU Kayla | V V D V D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 21 | JOESUF Thea | D D V D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 22 | KUO Liang-Jun | V D V D D | D | 0.5 | 2 | +1.5 |
| 23 | TANG Ming-Hao (Audrey) | D V D V D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 24 | CHEN Chloe | V V D D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 25 | DONG Nancy | D D D D V | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 26 | YANG Claire | D D D D V | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 27 | WANG Ian | D D D D V | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 28 | HO Cameron | D V D D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 29 | WONG Sebastian | D D D V D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 30 | JUSON Julianne Lauren | V D D D D | V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 31 | CHUNG Charlotte | D D D V D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 32 | LUO Derren | D D V D D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 33 | TUNG Alison | D D V D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 34 | CHEN Celina | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 35 | HAVERTY Joshua | D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 36 | DAI Wenyuan | D D D D D | D | 3.5 | 0 | -3.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.