The Riverside Hilton / Fitness Center - New Orleans, LA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | PETROSEWICZ Thomas (TJ) ". | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% | |
2 | HURME Tommi K. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 85% |
3 | LIOZNYANSKY Miron | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% | |
3 | KIM Gene | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% | |
5 | DECKER Hunter | - | - | 5% | 23% | 43% | 27% | 2% |
6 | ALVIOR Jacob A. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 23% | |
7 | ELLISON Harper F. | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% | |
8 | SANCHEZ Emanuel | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 22% | |
9 | MANDOKI Sandor I. | - | - | - | 4% | 30% | 65% | |
10 | LEECH Braedan | 1% | 27% | 44% | 23% | 4% | - | |
11 | PARKS-GOOD Tyler | 46% | 39% | 12% | 2% | < 1% | - | |
12 | MUNOZ Humberto | - | 5% | 22% | 41% | 28% | 5% | |
13 | CLARK Timothy J. | - | - | 4% | 25% | 47% | 24% | |
14 | QIAN Irvine | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
15 | TIEMANN Landen | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 39% | 17% | |
16 | ALVIOR Joshua Aethan B. | - | - | 3% | 21% | 46% | 30% | |
17 | SATHYAN Dev | 15% | 41% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
18 | SURESH NEERAJ | 5% | 28% | 46% | 18% | 2% | - | |
19 | NIXON Scott | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 5% | |
20 | DADE MAXIMUS | 1% | 14% | 37% | 34% | 12% | 2% | |
21 | VAN VACTER Thomas | 21% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | |
22 | OLSON Clayton M. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 1% |
23 | YANG Zeph | - | 1% | 12% | 37% | 41% | 8% | |
24 | POHL Philip | 34% | 46% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
25 | RAY William | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 10% | |
26 | GONZALEZ Kian | 3% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
27 | COATES Gregory | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | |
28 | KRAFFT Douglas | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 34% | 8% | |
29 | ALVIOR Jonathan Adrian | - | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 6% | - |
30 | IBANEZ Benjamin | 1% | 22% | 44% | 27% | 6% | - | |
31 | KERTESZ Stefan G. | 4% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
32 | WOODALL Ian L. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% | |
33 | CHALMERS Thomas | - | 9% | 34% | 40% | 15% | 1% | |
34 | WINKLER Michael | 26% | 49% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
35 | TRACY James | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | |
36 | CHIZ Max H. | 1% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
37 | GEIGER Devin T. | 6% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - | |
37 | BALACHANDRAN Manu | 85% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | |
39 | TUMULA Arihaan | 11% | 40% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | |
40 | FEE Aiden | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
41 | DERY MarkAlain | 22% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
42 | DUGAS Phillip H. | 3% | 27% | 45% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
43 | WERTH Mario | 23% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.