Southern Connecticut State University (James Moore Fieldhouse) - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KAO Castor T. | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 86% | |
| 2 | DESANDO Michael R. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 41% |
| 3 | CHEN Kyle P. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 43% | 12% |
| 3 | TAN Aidan | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 46% | 23% |
| 5 | DOELL Ethan | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 43% | 20% | |
| 6 | TANG Terry | - | - | 6% | 26% | 45% | 21% | 2% |
| 7 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 33% | 62% |
| 8 | ZHANG GAVIN J | 1% | 11% | 35% | 38% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 9 | PARRA Fabian | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 51% |
| 10 | TANG Alexander L. | - | 1% | 5% | 26% | 50% | 19% | |
| 11 | CHENG Logan | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 35% | 12% | 1% |
| 12 | DOBBINS Evan W. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 39% | 52% | |
| 13 | XU Ethan | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 34% | 9% | |
| 14 | BARTEL Jacob L. | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 50% | 5% | |
| 15 | BAI Brian | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 18% | 2% |
| 16 | ORLOV Dmitriy | 4% | 23% | 42% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 17 | LI Bradley | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 46% |
| 18 | WANG Rory | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 47% | 14% | |
| 19 | PARKER Isaiah | 4% | 24% | 42% | 26% | 4% | < 1% | |
| 20 | KATAYAMA Kevin | - | - | - | - | 2% | 26% | 71% |
| 20 | CHEN Ethan | - | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% |
| 22 | BELLUOMO David C. | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 54% | 25% |
| 23 | TANG August L. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 24 | ABRAMKIN Tim | 1% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 25 | SUSANTO William | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 26 | KROLEWSKI Alexander | 10% | 36% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | GATRELL Mitchell E. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 32% | 47% | 13% |
| 29 | SMITH Grant D. | - | 6% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 30 | KO Caleb | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 31 | GORLOVITZKI Amitai | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | DEEB Adam | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 33 | YAO Bradley | - | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 42% | 14% |
| 34 | LI Aaron | - | - | 1% | 6% | 30% | 52% | 12% |
| 35 | SHANNON Jack | 1% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 36 | URIBE GOMEZ Sebastian Javier | - | - | 6% | 25% | 44% | 25% | |
| 37 | LIU Aaron | 1% | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 38 | PAN Ethan | 1% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 13% | 1% | |
| 39 | HUA Aaron | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 40 | DAVIDSON Elliot | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 41 | ZENG Rick | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 42 | HAN Alexander | 1% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 43 | VIVEROS Evan | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 44 | CHA James | 2% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 45 | CHOI Benjamin | 6% | 30% | 41% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 46 | GONZALEZ Oliver | 6% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 47 | TOOMRE Kai | 7% | 30% | 40% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 48 | CHO Michael | - | - | 1% | 7% | 36% | 56% | |
| 49 | STAFFORD Gareth | 8% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 50 | WANG Brian | - | 6% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 51 | PLUMMER Waylon | 3% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 52 | BAI Austin | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 53 | MUNDAHL Brandon | - | 20% | 44% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
| 54 | ZAPPALA Nikolai | 3% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 55 | WYSZYNSKI Marek B. | - | - | < 1% | - | 5% | 39% | 56% |
| 56 | XU Nathan | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 57 | BERETICH Brian | 24% | 44% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | FROST Chayse | 25% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | TANG Royce | 1% | 38% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 60 | LEE Charles T | 10% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 61 | THOMAS Liam | 19% | 40% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 62 | LEE Thomas | 45% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 63 | HOLMES Alexiy | 19% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 64 | XU Ryan | 23% | 45% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 65 | BERNARD Jonathan | 80% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 66 | FERENCZ Alexander J. | 11% | 46% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 67 | REN Ryan | 31% | 46% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 68 | AYYAGARI Abhiram | 47% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 69 | MURPHY Damian J. | 9% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 70 | SHAMBARGER Graham | 65% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 70 | HOWARD Mekai | 97% | 3% | - | - | - | - | |
| 73 | EZEKIEL Nathan | 36% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 74 | LIGH Thomas | 1% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 74 | ULYSSE Jacob | 23% | 44% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.