Southern Connecticut State University (James Moore Fieldhouse) - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KAO Castor T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | |
| 2 | DESANDO Michael R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% |
| 3 | CHEN Kyle P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 12% |
| 3 | TAN Aidan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 23% |
| 5 | DOELL Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 20% | |
| 6 | TANG Terry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 23% | 2% |
| 7 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 62% |
| 8 | ZHANG GAVIN J | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 9 | PARRA Fabian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 51% |
| 10 | TANG Alexander L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 19% | |
| 11 | CHENG Logan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 13% | 1% |
| 12 | DOBBINS Evan W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 52% | |
| 13 | XU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% | 9% | |
| 14 | BARTEL Jacob L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% | 5% | |
| 15 | BAI Brian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 20% | 2% |
| 16 | ORLOV Dmitriy | 100% | 96% | 73% | 31% | 5% | - | |
| 17 | LI Bradley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% |
| 18 | WANG Rory | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 14% | |
| 19 | PARKER Isaiah | 100% | 96% | 73% | 31% | 4% | < 1% | |
| 20 | KATAYAMA Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 71% |
| 20 | CHEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% |
| 22 | BELLUOMO David C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 25% |
| 23 | TANG August L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
| 24 | ABRAMKIN Tim | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 19% | 2% | - |
| 25 | SUSANTO William | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 26 | KROLEWSKI Alexander | 100% | 90% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | GATRELL Mitchell E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 60% | 13% |
| 29 | SMITH Grant D. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 26% | 4% | - |
| 30 | KO Caleb | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 31 | GORLOVITZKI Amitai | 100% | 80% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | DEEB Adam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
| 33 | YAO Bradley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 14% |
| 34 | LI Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 63% | 12% |
| 35 | SHANNON Jack | 100% | 99% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 36 | URIBE GOMEZ Sebastian Javier | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 25% | |
| 37 | LIU Aaron | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 38 | PAN Ethan | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 14% | 1% | |
| 39 | HUA Aaron | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 19% | 2% | - |
| 40 | DAVIDSON Elliot | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
| 41 | ZENG Rick | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 50% | 11% | 1% |
| 42 | HAN Alexander | 100% | 99% | 81% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 43 | VIVEROS Evan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
| 44 | CHA James | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 45 | CHOI Benjamin | 100% | 94% | 65% | 23% | 3% | - | |
| 46 | GONZALEZ Oliver | 100% | 94% | 67% | 28% | 4% | - | |
| 47 | TOOMRE Kai | 100% | 93% | 63% | 23% | 3% | - | |
| 48 | CHO Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% | |
| 49 | STAFFORD Gareth | 100% | 92% | 62% | 23% | 3% | - | |
| 50 | WANG Brian | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 51 | PLUMMER Waylon | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 52 | BAI Austin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 53 | MUNDAHL Brandon | 100% | 100% | 80% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
| 54 | ZAPPALA Nikolai | 100% | 97% | 79% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 55 | WYSZYNSKI Marek B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 56% |
| 56 | XU Nathan | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 57 | BERETICH Brian | 100% | 76% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | FROST Chayse | 100% | 75% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | TANG Royce | 100% | 99% | 61% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 60 | LEE Charles T | 100% | 90% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 61 | THOMAS Liam | 100% | 81% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 62 | LEE Thomas | 100% | 55% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 63 | HOLMES Alexiy | 100% | 81% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 64 | XU Ryan | 100% | 77% | 31% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 65 | BERNARD Jonathan | 100% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 66 | FERENCZ Alexander J. | 100% | 89% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 67 | REN Ryan | 100% | 69% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 68 | AYYAGARI Abhiram | 100% | 53% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 69 | MURPHY Damian J. | 100% | 91% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 70 | SHAMBARGER Graham | 100% | 35% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 70 | HOWARD Mekai | 100% | 3% | - | - | - | - | |
| 73 | EZEKIEL Nathan | 100% | 64% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 74 | LIGH Thomas | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 74 | ULYSSE Jacob | 100% | 77% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.