Avant-Garde Fencers Club - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HUANG Nathan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 9% | |
| 2 | TSUI Raedyn Ho Hin | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 5% | |
| 3 | LAY Apollonia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 16% |
| 3 | TRUJILLO Jonah | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% | |
| 5 | FLANAGAN Miles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 32% | |
| 6 | MONAT Jennifer | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% | |
| 7 | TRAN Matthew | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
| 8 | YUNG Brandon | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 9 | CHARETTE Matthew | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 8% | |
| 10 | MCCARVILL Cooper | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 17% | 2% |
| 11 | WHARTON David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 11% | - |
| 12 | VARIDIREDDY Suhan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% | |
| 13 | TONEF Christian | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
| 14 | TEJAKUSUMA Eric | 100% | 75% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 15 | LEE Colin | 100% | 100% | 82% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 16 | ZIEGLER Everisto | 100% | 100% | 90% | 57% | 19% | 2% | |
| 17 | NEMANICK Eric Joseph | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% | |
| 18 | TU Averie | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 19 | WARD Mads | 100% | 81% | 31% | 5% | - | - | |
| 20 | BHATIA Neil | 100% | 99% | 85% | 50% | 17% | 2% | |
| 21 | SHADRAVAN Arash | 100% | 73% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 22 | PICACHE Crockett | 100% | 99% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 23 | CRAIG Chris | 100% | 88% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 24 | TRAN Andrew | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 25 | OLINGER Harrison | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.