Southern Connecticut State University (James Moore Fieldhouse) - New Haven, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | WANG Dina C. | V V V V V | V V V V V | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 2 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 3 | LAZAR Carolina | V V V D V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 3 | CHEN Sophie | V V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 5 | ZELDIN Nadia | V V D V V V | V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 6 | BASILE Gianna | V V D V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 7 | BADLANI Diya | V V D V V D | V V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 9 | JIANG Chloe | V V V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 10 | ROBERTS Anastasia | V V V D V V | V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 11 | CHEN Jephanie Y. | V V D V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 12 | PANNONE Elisa | V D V V V | V V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 13 | COLE Sofia | D V V V D V | V V | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 14 | LIU Yinuo | D D V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 15 | SONG Jenna | D D V V V V | V V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 16 | GREENLEAF Ella | D V V D V | V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 17 | HUSSIAN Annabelle | V V V V V V | 3.8 | 6 | +2.2 | |
| 18 | LIN Katherine | V V D V V V | D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 19 | LI Christina | D V V V D V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 20 | HUANG Sophie | D V V V V D | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 21 | NICUDEMUS Bryella | D V V V D V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 22 | KATS Ekaterina | V V D V V D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 23 | CHOI Cara | V D D V V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 24 | YUAN Agnes | V V D D V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 25 | YANIV Liya | D D V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 26 | MEYER Claudia | V D V V D D | V D | 5.0 | 3 | -2.0 |
| 27 | POWLEDGE Cora | V D D V V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 28 | POLING Katherine | V D D D V | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 29 | PUOPOLO Mia | V V D D D | V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 30 | KIM Claire | D V V D D D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 31 | LAVINE Samantha | V D D D D V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 32 | VACCARO Lillian | D V D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 33 | BAULIN Zoya | D V V V D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 34 | OTTAVIANO Maris | V D V D V D | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 35 | CHRISTENSEN Nora | V D D V D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 36 | SHAH Mahi | D D V V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 37 | DEEKEN Anna | V D D V D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 38 | JUNCADELLA Lucy | D V D V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 | |
| 39 | ZINITI-LAU Elena | V V D D D D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 40 | QI Annabelle | D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 41 | ZHOU Sophia | V D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 42 | SNYDERS Evelyn | D D D D V | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 43 | MAIA ZUCKERMAN Julia | D D D V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 44 | JIANG Doris | D V D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 45 | WALMSLEY Rowan | D D D D D V | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 46 | PEPE Natalia | D V D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 47 | ERSHOVA Anastasia | D D V D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 47 | LOPES Julia | D D D D V D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 49 | LENZ Phoebe | D V D D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 50 | SONG Sarah | D D V D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 51 | POPOVA Polina | D D D D D D | D | 3.4 | 0 | -3.4 |
| 52 | BENADOUDA Ines | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 53 | MCCORMICK Ella | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 54 | ALDREDGE Ginny Rebecca | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.