Southern Connecticut State University (James Moore Fieldhouse) - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WANG Dina C. | - | - | 5% | 23% | 43% | 29% | |
| 2 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 52% |
| 3 | LAZAR Carolina | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 3 | CHEN Sophie | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 41% | 17% | |
| 5 | ZELDIN Nadia | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% |
| 6 | BASILE Gianna | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 43% | 28% | |
| 7 | BADLANI Diya | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
| 9 | JIANG Chloe | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% |
| 10 | ROBERTS Anastasia | - | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 45% | 14% |
| 11 | CHEN Jephanie Y. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% | |
| 12 | PANNONE Elisa | 1% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
| 13 | COLE Sofia | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 14 | LIU Yinuo | - | - | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
| 15 | SONG Jenna | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 28% |
| 16 | GREENLEAF Ella | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
| 17 | HUSSIAN Annabelle | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 4% |
| 18 | LIN Katherine | - | - | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
| 19 | LI Christina | - | 3% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 20 | HUANG Sophie | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 36% | 11% |
| 21 | NICUDEMUS Bryella | 1% | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 22 | KATS Ekaterina | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 23 | CHOI Cara | 1% | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 24 | YUAN Agnes | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
| 25 | YANIV Liya | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 26 | MEYER Claudia | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 42% | 29% |
| 27 | POWLEDGE Cora | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% | |
| 28 | POLING Katherine | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | |
| 29 | PUOPOLO Mia | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 40% | 16% | |
| 30 | KIM Claire | 1% | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 31 | LAVINE Samantha | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 32 | VACCARO Lillian | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | BAULIN Zoya | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
| 34 | OTTAVIANO Maris | 19% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 35 | CHRISTENSEN Nora | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
| 36 | SHAH Mahi | 5% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 6% | - | |
| 37 | DEEKEN Anna | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 38 | JUNCADELLA Lucy | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | ZINITI-LAU Elena | 1% | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 40 | QI Annabelle | 12% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 41 | ZHOU Sophia | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 42 | SNYDERS Evelyn | 2% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
| 43 | MAIA ZUCKERMAN Julia | 26% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | JIANG Doris | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 45 | WALMSLEY Rowan | 5% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 46 | PEPE Natalia | 18% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 47 | ERSHOVA Anastasia | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 47 | LOPES Julia | 8% | 34% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 49 | LENZ Phoebe | 38% | 51% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 50 | SONG Sarah | 50% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 51 | POPOVA Polina | < 1% | 4% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 52 | BENADOUDA Ines | 36% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 53 | MCCORMICK Ella | 55% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 54 | ALDREDGE Ginny Rebecca | 45% | 47% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.