Southern Connecticut State University (James Moore Fieldhouse) - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | JAN Stephen | - | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 55% | |
| 2 | WYSZYNSKI Marek B. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% |
| 3 | PIMOUTKINE Roustam R. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 47% |
| 3 | KURPASKA Jonathan A. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 5 | CHO Michael | - | - | 2% | 14% | 39% | 36% | 9% |
| 6 | GONZALEZ II John L. | 1% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 7 | RIFFATERRE Jason | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 8 | CROWDER Andrew E. | 3% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 9 | EPPLY-SCHMIDT Paul | - | - | - | 14% | 46% | 40% | |
| 10 | VILLEMINOT Nicolas | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 36% | 11% |
| 11 | TURDO Mark A. | - | - | 2% | 34% | 48% | 16% | |
| 12 | LAWRENCE John W. | - | - | 1% | 31% | 49% | 18% | |
| 13 | CHENG Thomas | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 14 | PAVLOVICH Robert | - | - | 1% | 12% | 40% | 38% | 9% |
| 15 | VIVEROS Oscar A. | 12% | 48% | 38% | 2% | - | - | |
| 16 | ROLANDO Doc | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 3% | |
| 17 | GREENLEAF John | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 18 | WILBERT Matt | 9% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 19 | MAURI Gherardo | 2% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 20 | SCHNEIDERMAN todd | 34% | 43% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 21 | PHO Eric | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 22 | MASTRONARDI Joseph M. | 10% | 48% | 40% | 2% | - | - | |
| 23 | SPRINGER Michael | 57% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 24 | DORFMAN Mitchell (Mitch) J. | 2% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 25 | BOTWINICK Nelson G. | 58% | 36% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 26 | RUSANOV Oleg | 13% | 40% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.