Southern Connecticut State University (James Moore Fieldhouse) - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BASRALIAN Azniv | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% |
| 2 | GOH Cayla | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 3 | LEE Lavender | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
| 3 | DHAIYA Tanya | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 5% |
| 5 | QI Julieanne | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 18% | |
| 6 | SONG Angela | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
| 7 | JOYAL Anne-Sophie | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 40% | 50% |
| 8 | WANG Chloe | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 40% | 14% | 1% |
| 9 | EDWARDS Auprell | - | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 44% | 22% |
| 10 | XIAO Nancy | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% |
| 11 | TRAN Helena | - | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% |
| 12 | CAMPBELL Anahit M. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% |
| 13 | TCHERNYSHOV ANNA | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 14 | CHOY LeeAnn | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% |
| 15 | WU Michelle | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
| 16 | PRESMAN Aerin | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 3% |
| 17 | LEE Claire | - | - | 1% | 6% | 28% | 48% | 18% |
| 18 | SEREGIN Katya | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% |
| 19 | KAUR Manroop | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 2% |
| 20 | WONG Sydney | 1% | 8% | 35% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 21 | RICHARDSON Meredith | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 17% |
| 22 | JU Jennifer | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 23 | LI Fei | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 44% | 25% |
| 24 | DESANTIS-IBANEZ Elena | - | 5% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 25 | LAU Karina | 36% | 43% | 17% | 3% | < 1% | - | - |
| 26 | ADYANTHAYA Anika | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% | |
| 27 | WANG Sophie Y. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 36% | 35% | 12% |
| 28 | LAW Mila | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 29 | HOAGLAND Sally | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 30 | LOBANOVA Varvara | - | 5% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 31 | WANG Trinity | - | - | 5% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 5% |
| 32 | CHEN Alina | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 33 | YOUN Emily | 23% | 56% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 34 | WESER Veronica U. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 7% |
| 35 | VENKATESAN Harshitha | 1% | 25% | 43% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 36 | YOUN Kylie | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | BYRON Karen J. | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
| 38 | CHERNOBRIVETS Maria | 1% | 26% | 44% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 39 | PETROFF Eva | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 40 | ZHENG Kristen | 37% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 41 | GOLIYAD Lisa | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 42 | ERSHOVA Anastasia | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 43 | SONG Charlotte | 10% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 44 | XIAO Katelyn | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 45 | DUNNE Jessica | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 46 | SHETH Anayaà | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 47 | WILLIAMSON Beatrix | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 48 | BOROTKO Katerina | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 49 | MONITTO Malina | 8% | 32% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | FOMINA Polina | - | 6% | 24% | 41% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 51 | DANNHAUSER Carol A. | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | MARCHANT Morgan | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 53 | GORTI Aadya | 59% | 37% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 53 | BUES Caelan | 88% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 53 | LE NOC’H Farrah | 40% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.