Southern Connecticut State University (James Moore Fieldhouse) - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BASRALIAN Azniv | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% |
| 2 | GOH Cayla | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
| 3 | LEE Lavender | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
| 3 | DHAIYA Tanya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 30% | 5% |
| 5 | QI Julieanne | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 18% | |
| 6 | SONG Angela | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
| 7 | JOYAL Anne-Sophie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 50% |
| 8 | WANG Chloe | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 16% | 1% |
| 9 | EDWARDS Auprell | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 22% |
| 10 | XIAO Nancy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% |
| 11 | TRAN Helena | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 19% | 3% |
| 12 | CAMPBELL Anahit M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 14% |
| 13 | TCHERNYSHOV ANNA | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 14 | CHOY LeeAnn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
| 15 | WU Michelle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 9% |
| 16 | PRESMAN Aerin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
| 17 | LEE Claire | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 18% |
| 18 | SEREGIN Katya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% |
| 19 | KAUR Manroop | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 18% | 2% |
| 20 | WONG Sydney | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 21 | RICHARDSON Meredith | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
| 22 | JU Jennifer | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 23 | LI Fei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 25% |
| 24 | DESANTIS-IBANEZ Elena | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 25 | LAU Karina | 100% | 64% | 20% | 3% | < 1% | - | - |
| 26 | ADYANTHAYA Anika | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 16% | |
| 27 | WANG Sophie Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 12% |
| 28 | LAW Mila | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 29 | HOAGLAND Sally | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 30 | LOBANOVA Varvara | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 31 | WANG Trinity | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 31% | 5% |
| 32 | CHEN Alina | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 33 | YOUN Emily | 100% | 77% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 34 | WESER Veronica U. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 7% |
| 35 | VENKATESAN Harshitha | 100% | 99% | 73% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 36 | YOUN Kylie | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | BYRON Karen J. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
| 38 | CHERNOBRIVETS Maria | 100% | 99% | 73% | 29% | 6% | - | - |
| 39 | PETROFF Eva | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 40 | ZHENG Kristen | 100% | 63% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 41 | GOLIYAD Lisa | 100% | 90% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 42 | ERSHOVA Anastasia | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 43 | SONG Charlotte | 100% | 90% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 44 | XIAO Katelyn | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 45 | DUNNE Jessica | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 46 | SHETH Anayaà | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 47 | WILLIAMSON Beatrix | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 48 | BOROTKO Katerina | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 49 | MONITTO Malina | 100% | 92% | 60% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | FOMINA Polina | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 29% | 5% | - |
| 51 | DANNHAUSER Carol A. | 100% | 86% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | MARCHANT Morgan | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 53 | GORTI Aadya | 100% | 41% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 53 | BUES Caelan | 100% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 53 | LE NOC’H Farrah | 100% | 60% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.