Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HSU Kaylin | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 44% | 41% |
| 2 | BAE Yooju | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 48% | 30% |
| 3 | REN Kayley | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 58% |
| 3 | ZHANG Ivy | - | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% |
| 5 | SAIFEE Lamya | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 32% |
| 6 | LENK Sophie | - | - | 4% | 21% | 45% | 30% | |
| 6 | LIU Ariana | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 37% | 17% | |
| 8 | LIU Ashley | 3% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
| 9 | WYNN Kylie | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 31% | |
| 10 | HSIAO Ariya | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 14% | 1% |
| 11 | TAYLOR Gabrielle | - | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% |
| 12 | KIM Sydney | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% |
| 13 | SUN Emily | - | - | - | 3% | 20% | 56% | 21% |
| 14 | LIU Samantha | - | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% |
| 15 | XIE Su | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 39% | 15% |
| 16 | DESAI Esha | 1% | 11% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 17 | MIYASHIRO Katelyn | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 18 | PENG Serena | - | - | 1% | 9% | 41% | 39% | 10% |
| 19 | ZHOU Chenchu | - | - | 2% | 13% | 38% | 36% | 11% |
| 20 | WAHBA fatima | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% |
| 21 | LUO Miranda | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 13% | |
| 22 | WU Chingfei Amber | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
| 23 | CASTANEDA Keira | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 48% | 26% |
| 24 | GUAN Adeline | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 45% | 24% | |
| 25 | THERON Zoe | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 7% |
| 26 | NARANJO Kristin | - | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 10% |
| 27 | GU Chen | - | 9% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 28 | TAO Ann | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 29 | AHN Hayley | 8% | 53% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | WILLIAMSON Tessa | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 31 | YANG Hanli | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 32 | CHANG Olivia | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 33 | YONG Rosalind | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 7% |
| 34 | LEVESQUE Brielle | - | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 8% |
| 35 | LI Chelsea | 1% | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 36 | TAN Shouyin | 6% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 37 | ZHOU Joi | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 38 | PEDERSEN Haley | - | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 39% | 9% |
| 39 | HSU Rachel | 5% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 40 | LIM Kensie | 8% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 41 | YU Sophie | 6% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 42 | CHOI Sophie | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 43 | SAH Madeleine | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 44 | CHO Karis | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 45 | HAN Gian | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | |
| 46 | ZONG Melody | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% | |
| 47 | VILLARAMA Kara | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 15% | 2% |
| 48 | LIN Allison | 1% | 11% | 37% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 49 | FANG Kelervia | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 50 | JACOB Norah | 1% | 12% | 34% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 51 | GUO Audrey | 3% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 52 | BHANGOO Paloma | 29% | 46% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 53 | XIA Isabella | 16% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 54 | LAY Apollonia | 5% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 55 | ZHANG Viviana | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | |
| 56 | HUGHES Bailey | 13% | 38% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 57 | ARYA Leela | 16% | 43% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | ANDONIAN Lauren | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 59 | TEWARI Amaira | 40% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 60 | YU Xintong | 50% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 61 | NORRIS Erin | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 61 | QURESHI Zoya | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 63 | HAN Mia | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
| 64 | CHANG Janelle | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 65 | LUCAS Ava | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 66 | DING Madison | 4% | 26% | 45% | 23% | 3% | - | - |
| 67 | VOROBIEV Alexandra | 29% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 68 | CHU Felicity | 26% | 47% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 69 | TAI Taphanie | 46% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 70 | SCHULTZ Sumi | 8% | 33% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 71 | LEE Abigail | 36% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 72 | RIGBY Ellie | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 73 | GUTIERREZ Gia | 75% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 74 | PARK Amelie | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.