Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MANN Sophia J. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% |
| 2 | WU Yuwei | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 4% |
| 3 | KWON Hannah | 1% | 6% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 3 | YUEN Nicole | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 5 | TENG EMMA | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 6 | JIANG Evelyn | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% | |
| 7 | BORTAI Eliza | 22% | 44% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 8 | LOMOTAN Addison | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | - |
| 9 | DOHERTY Maverick L. | - | - | - | - | - | 10% | 89% |
| 10 | DANG Kelia | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% | |
| 11 | LIU kai yin aria | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% |
| 12 | ARNOLD Hali | - | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 19% |
| 13 | CAI Xinyi | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% |
| 14 | RAGHURAMAN Anishka | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 15 | TONG Laurie | - | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 16 | ZHAI AMY | - | 5% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 17 | LIU Hannah | - | 5% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 18 | KANG Ellie | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% | |
| 19 | WANG Jiayi | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 20 | PALEO Gabriella | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 40% | 41% |
| 21 | MUNGUIA Mila | 3% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
| 22 | DIECK Miranda P. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% |
| 23 | BONIS-RAMIREZ Mirka A. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% |
| 24 | KIM Satie | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 25 | SEAL Julie T. | - | - | < 1% | 5% | 29% | 66% | |
| 26 | YU Stella | 4% | 29% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 27 | TENG Christine Renmei | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% | |
| 28 | YU Skylar | 3% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 29 | HAN Emma | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 30 | WONG Natalie | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 9% | - |
| 31 | HWANG Charlotte | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 32 | KIRBY Skye | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | LIN Annika | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 34 | WILSON Eva | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 35 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 36 | SENGUPTA Jia | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 37 | CONG Anne | 1% | 6% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 3% | |
| 38 | LIN Elaine | - | 1% | 12% | 35% | 39% | 13% | |
| 39 | NING Lynn | 6% | 32% | 41% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 40 | CHEN Elaine | 1% | 9% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 2% | |
| 41 | LONG Jessie | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 1% |
| 42 | SHEARER Alena | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 43 | TURIANO Nadelle | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 44 | XA-CHIN Sara | - | 4% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 45 | MATSUO Kei | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 11% | |
| 46 | CHANG Annette | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 47 | OOI Ming Qin | 46% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 48 | LIN Ariel | 1% | 33% | 41% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 48 | HENRY Erin | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 50 | LO Chloe | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 50 | ZHANG JADY | 8% | 36% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 52 | SAMPATH Medha | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 53 | CHIANG Melissa | - | < 1% | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
| 54 | PANCHAL Arya | 26% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 55 | SUN Angela | 61% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 56 | WONG Cerise | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 57 | HUANG Wanyi | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 58 | ANDERSON Kathryn | 93% | 7% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 59 | LIM Eunice | 38% | 41% | 17% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 60 | ASPIRAS Avery | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.