Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MANN Sophia J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 43% |
2 | WU Yuwei | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 4% |
3 | KWON Hannah | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
3 | YUEN Nicole | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
5 | TENG EMMA | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
6 | JIANG Evelyn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% | |
7 | BORTAI Eliza | 100% | 78% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | |
8 | LOMOTAN Addison | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 12% | - |
9 | DOHERTY Maverick L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 89% |
10 | DANG Kelia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 28% | |
11 | LIU kai yin aria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% |
12 | ARNOLD Hali | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 56% | 19% |
13 | CAI Xinyi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 12% |
14 | RAGHURAMAN Anishka | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
15 | TONG Laurie | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
16 | ZHAI AMY | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
17 | LIU Hannah | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
18 | KANG Ellie | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% | |
19 | WANG Jiayi | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
20 | PALEO Gabriella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 41% |
21 | MUNGUIA Mila | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 10% | 1% | |
22 | DIECK Miranda P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 6% |
23 | BONIS-RAMIREZ Mirka A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 5% |
24 | KIM Satie | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
25 | SEAL Julie T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% | |
26 | YU Stella | 100% | 96% | 67% | 25% | 4% | - | |
27 | TENG Christine Renmei | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% | |
28 | YU Skylar | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 3% | - |
29 | HAN Emma | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
30 | WONG Natalie | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 9% | - |
31 | HWANG Charlotte | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
32 | KIRBY Skye | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
33 | LIN Annika | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 18% | 2% |
34 | WILSON Eva | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
35 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
36 | SENGUPTA Jia | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - |
37 | CONG Anne | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 27% | 3% | |
38 | LIN Elaine | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 13% | |
39 | NING Lynn | 100% | 94% | 62% | 22% | 3% | - | |
40 | CHEN Elaine | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 22% | 2% | |
41 | LONG Jessie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 19% | 1% |
42 | SHEARER Alena | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
43 | TURIANO Nadelle | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
44 | XA-CHIN Sara | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
45 | MATSUO Kei | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 11% | |
46 | CHANG Annette | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
47 | OOI Ming Qin | 100% | 54% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
48 | LIN Ariel | 100% | 99% | 66% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
48 | HENRY Erin | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
50 | LO Chloe | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
50 | ZHANG JADY | 100% | 92% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
52 | SAMPATH Medha | 100% | 60% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
53 | CHIANG Melissa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
54 | PANCHAL Arya | 100% | 74% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
55 | SUN Angela | 100% | 39% | 6% | - | - | - | |
56 | WONG Cerise | 100% | 87% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | |
57 | HUANG Wanyi | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
58 | ANDERSON Kathryn | 100% | 7% | - | - | - | - | - |
59 | LIM Eunice | 100% | 62% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
60 | ASPIRAS Avery | 100% | 69% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.