Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GUAN Adeline | - | - | 4% | 21% | 46% | 29% | |
| 2 | ZHOU Joi | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 31% | |
| 3 | LENK Sophie | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
| 3 | VILLARAMA Kara | - | - | 5% | 26% | 56% | 13% | |
| 5 | PEDERSEN Haley | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 32% | 32% | 13% |
| 5 | LI Chelsea | - | 3% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 7 | HSIAO Ariya | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 40% | 16% | |
| 8 | CHEN Jephanie Y. | - | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
| 9 | MIYASHIRO Katelyn | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 10 | TAYLOR Gabrielle | - | 1% | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 9% |
| 11 | DESAI Esha | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 27% | 7% | |
| 12 | JOHNSON Shelby | - | - | 4% | 21% | 46% | 29% | |
| 13 | ARYA Leela | 20% | 43% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 14 | TROXEL Sylvie A. | - | - | - | 2% | 26% | 72% | |
| 15 | ANDONIAN Lauren | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% | |
| 16 | LIN Allison | 7% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 17 | GU Chen | 1% | 6% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 12% | 2% |
| 18 | SAH Madeleine | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
| 19 | CHOI Sophie | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 20 | LAY Apollonia | 2% | 13% | 27% | 31% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 21 | LEE Abigail | 5% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 4% | - | |
| 22 | LI Serena | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 42% | 27% |
| 23 | HAN Mia | 1% | 5% | 17% | 30% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
| 24 | JACOB Norah | 5% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 25 | BHANGOO Paloma | 30% | 44% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 26 | QURESHI Zoya | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 27 | VOROBIEV Alexandra | 26% | 42% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 28 | MONAT Jennifer | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 2% |
| 29 | LUCAS Ava | 24% | 43% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | HAN Gian | 1% | 7% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 31 | HUA Cheyenne | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
| 32 | SEAL Ayda | 10% | 35% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | GILLETTE Eleanor | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
| 34 | HSU Rachel | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 35 | FANG Kelervia | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 36 | DING Madison | 6% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 3% | - | |
| 37 | HUGHES Bailey | 36% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | |
| 38 | CHANG Janelle | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 39 | JONES Olivia | 4% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
| 40 | GARDNER desaree | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 41 | BENNYHOFF Naia | 4% | 44% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | TAN Shouyin | 18% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 43 | WILLIAMSON Tessa | 1% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% | 2% | |
| 44 | FRENZINGER Kate | 7% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 2% | - |
| 45 | FENG Sophia | 86% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.