Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | DU Evan | - | - | - | - | - | 9% | 90% |
2 | LI Stephen | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 23% | |
3 | KHUSHRAJ Rohan | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 38% | 21% |
3 | SUN Jiarui (Jerry) | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 41% | 13% | |
5 | JU Shang | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% | |
6 | LIU Yihong | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 39% | 15% | |
7 | MOSLEY Wally | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% |
8 | WONG Kyle | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
9 | TIAN Dylan | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 38% | 31% | 6% |
10 | WU Nathan | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 47% | |
11 | LEE Lucas | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 41% | 25% |
12 | NGUYEN Norris | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 30% | 1% |
13 | YOO Lucas | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% | |
14 | GUO Jonathan | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 7% |
15 | YUN Mason | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 21% | 1% |
16 | LI Vance | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% | |
17 | HWANG Matthew | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 50% |
18 | LIN Bryan | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
19 | ZHANG Jenson | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
20 | SHIH Derek | - | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 32% | 7% |
21 | YI Alexander | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 31% | 3% | |
22 | TENG Eric | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
23 | LIN Logan | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% |
24 | DIRKSEN Jamie | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
25 | KOU Logan | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
26 | BALUCAN Gabriel | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
27 | CHAN Nathan | - | 4% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
28 | YOON Ian | 1% | 8% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
29 | FU Benjamin | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
30 | GUO zhaohong | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 5% | 1% |
31 | PARK Sihoon | 2% | 13% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
32 | LEE Connor | 18% | 42% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
33 | WANG Mason | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
34 | YIM Antonio | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
35 | BOROVIKOV Alexander | - | 3% | 15% | 30% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
36 | YE Andrew | 2% | 17% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
37 | REN Mark | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
38 | HAN Alex | 13% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | |
39 | HONG Eason | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
40 | CHO Lincoln | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | |
41 | LAU Jesse | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 2% | - | |
42 | LI John | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
43 | DAI Greyson | 51% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
44 | LI Connor | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
45 | LO Stefan | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
46 | DUCOURNAU Enzo | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
47 | LIU Aiden | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% | |
48 | DEMIRCHIAN Edward | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
49 | LIU Zihao | 13% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | |
50 | CHU Clayton | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
51 | FONG Ethan | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
52 | HAO Hardy | 8% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
53 | KIM Hayden | 1% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
54 | GONG Rongtao | 10% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
55 | PINCHUK Spencer | 1% | 7% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% | |
56 | HUYNH Ethan | 2% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 13% | 1% | |
57 | EVANS Harvey | 21% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
58 | LEE Daniel | 36% | 41% | 18% | 4% | 1% | - | - |
59 | KIM Christian | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
60 | LI Ethan | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
61 | BUSH Andrew | < 1% | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
62 | LI nathan zeting | 19% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
62 | WANG Alexander | 12% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
64 | NISHIOKA Hiro | 28% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
65 | YANG XINRUI | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
66 | SALIM Ethan | 29% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
67 | WANG Franklin | 12% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 2% | - | |
68 | AKKARA Skyler | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
69 | HAILU Noah | 1% | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
70 | YANG Rony | 13% | 40% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
71 | LU Mark | 40% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
72 | TU Austin | < 1% | 5% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 4% | |
73 | GAN Samuel | 18% | 39% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.