Danvers Indoor Sports - DANVERS, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LUO Alexander | - | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 65% |
| 2 | TANG Luke | - | 5% | 18% | 34% | 32% | 12% | |
| 3 | CHEN Daniel | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% | |
| 3 | CHEN Evan | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 57% |
| 5 | LAI Jayden | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% | |
| 6 | ZHENG Jasper | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% | |
| 7 | CHEN Hayden | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 39% | 15% | |
| 8 | IVANOV Andrew | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | |
| 9 | DAI Jason | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% | |
| 10 | JIN Noah | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 11 | PINCIROLI Tommaso | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
| 12 | YIN Xiangheng | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
| 13 | ZOU Grant | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | |
| 14 | YOON Jonathan | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 15 | WANG William | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 16 | LANE Sawyer | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 17 | LI Jayden | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
| 18 | SCHLUBACH Jasper | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | |
| 19 | HOREMIOTIS Bennett | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% | |
| 20 | NOVAK Luke | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 21 | LI Sean | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | |
| 22 | WANG Lucas | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% | |
| 23 | LAW Benjamin | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | MILLER Brodrick | 11% | 31% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 25 | CHEN Regis | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | |
| 26 | CARPENTER Taisei | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 5% | |
| 27 | WANG Henry | 9% | 29% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
| 28 | YANTZ Rhys | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
| 29 | EFFEL Samuel | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
| 30 | GREGORY Milo | 18% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 31 | FLANAGAN Ronan | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 32 | ZHU Kingsley | 6% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 33 | TAN Wyatt | 21% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 34 | LUO Sebastian | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 3% |
| 35 | DANA Miles | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
| 36 | YAN Milan | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 37 | ZHANG Jacob | 8% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 38 | RICHARDSON Matthew | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | |
| 39 | HATZIGIANNIS Paris | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | - | - | |
| 40 | HERIGSTAD Daniel | 5% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
| 41 | YU MAXIMILIAN | 8% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 5% | 1% | |
| 42 | YADAV Aarav | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 43 | MILOWSKY Majai | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
| 44 | BIXBY Meer | 6% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.