Danvers Indoor Sports - DANVERS, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SPRINGER Sierra | - | - | - | - | - | 8% | 91% |
2 | XIAO Nancy | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% |
3 | KAUR Manroop | - | 1% | 13% | 39% | 41% | 7% | |
3 | BALAZS Luca | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 19% | |
5 | LI Fei | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 64% |
6 | SONG Angela | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 42% | 45% |
7 | DHAIYA Tanya | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 43% | 19% | |
8 | LAW Mila | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
9 | YANG Hanting(Catherine) | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 35% | 8% |
10 | BURROWS Beatrice | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
11 | WANG Sophie Y. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 40% | 11% |
12 | LI Alice | - | - | 4% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 8% |
13 | LI Yixin Catherine | - | 5% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 5% | |
14 | LOBANOVA Varvara | - | - | 4% | 19% | 40% | 32% | 5% |
15 | LIU Chloe | 2% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
16 | YOUN Emily | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | |
17 | WANG Chloe | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 20% | |
18 | CHERNOBRIVETS Maria | 2% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | |
19 | CHEN Alina | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 3% |
20 | HOAGLAND Sally | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 1% |
21 | FOMINA Polina | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 21% | 3% |
22 | LI Caroline | - | - | 6% | 25% | 43% | 26% | |
23 | SONG Charlotte | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
24 | JIANG chenxi | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
25 | WILLIAMSON Beatrix | - | 15% | 39% | 33% | 12% | 1% | |
26 | BI Michelle | 1% | 27% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | |
27 | XU Mulan | 14% | 45% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | |
28 | IVANOV Angela-Sophie | 20% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
29 | POYNTON Cora | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
30 | TIAN Victoria | 4% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
31 | EKSHTUT Leah | 1% | 12% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | |
32 | GRUDZINSKI Josephine | 53% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
33 | SUN Nicole | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 48% | |
34 | DESANTIS-IBANEZ Elena | - | 8% | 32% | 41% | 17% | 2% | |
35 | GUO Callista | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
36 | DING Iris Siyue | 10% | 33% | 38% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
37 | CHEN Allison | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
38 | XIAO Katelyn | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% | - |
39 | YANAGIDA Coco | 36% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
40 | JAISON Carol | 96% | 4% | - | - | - | - | |
41 | WU Madisen | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
42 | STOCKTON Catherine | 18% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
43 | NGUYEN Celena | 1% | 11% | 33% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - |
44 | ERIKSEN Kate | 22% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
45 | SONKU Mira | 4% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
46 | LE NOC’H Farrah | 17% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.