Danvers Indoor Sports - DANVERS, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WANG YiXi | - | - | - | - | 6% | 45% | 49% |
| 2 | KOPYLTSOVA Elizaveta | - | - | - | - | 2% | 46% | 51% |
| 3 | MCFARLANE Asha | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 32% | |
| 3 | WANG CAROL | - | - | - | - | 4% | 53% | 43% |
| 5 | BING Charlotte | - | - | - | 6% | 36% | 58% | |
| 5 | FENG Audrey | - | - | - | 3% | 30% | 67% | |
| 7 | LI Joy | - | - | 1% | 12% | 51% | 36% | |
| 8 | ZHAO Olivia | - | 1% | 6% | 30% | 48% | 15% | |
| 9 | LI Christina | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 10 | PUTHOFF Olivia | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 39% | 14% | |
| 11 | JIANG Chloe | - | - | 1% | 8% | 47% | 44% | |
| 12 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% | |
| 13 | WANG DINA C. | - | 1% | 6% | 30% | 51% | 13% | |
| 14 | DE CASTRO Kai | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | - |
| 15 | BERTOLINI Mia | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 1% | |
| 16 | YIN Chloe | - | 9% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 3% | |
| 17 | CHEN Sophie | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 39% | 14% | |
| 18 | LAVINE Samantha | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% | 1% | - |
| 19 | SUN Erin | 4% | 24% | 44% | 25% | 3% | - | |
| 20 | IWERSEN Marte | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
| 21 | SHUTZER Lily | 2% | 17% | 41% | 34% | 6% | - | |
| 22 | SFINTESCU Emma | 1% | 12% | 36% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
| 23 | LI Junhan | 1% | 15% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 1% | |
| 24 | ZINITI-LAU Elena | 2% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
| 25 | GOODMAN Carden | 6% | 29% | 43% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 26 | VACCARO Lillian | 14% | 42% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 27 | COLE Sofia | - | 6% | 28% | 45% | 19% | 2% | |
| 28 | OTTAVIANO Maris | 29% | 45% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 29 | MANGLANI Maya | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 30 | KOESTERS Florentine | 3% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 8% | - | - |
| 31 | LEO Jenna | 7% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 32 | JUNCADELLA Lucy | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
| 33 | CHAN Kaitlyn | 23% | 46% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 34 | MAIA ZUCKERMAN Julia | 17% | 43% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | CHUNG Stella | 10% | 35% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 36 | XU-FERGUSON Victoria | 6% | 28% | 42% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 37 | ZHANG Caroline | 1% | 11% | 33% | 38% | 16% | 1% | - |
| 38 | JIANG Doris | 11% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 39 | BO Iris | 1% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% | |
| 40 | HONG Mabel | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | MCCLELLAN Florence | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 42 | HUDSON Sophie | 79% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 43 | MCCORMICK Ella | 40% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 44 | BENNETT Emi | 31% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.