Danvers Indoor Sports - DANVERS, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WANG YiXi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 49% |
2 | KOPYLTSOVA Elizaveta | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 51% |
3 | MCFARLANE Asha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 32% | |
3 | WANG CAROL | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 42% |
5 | BING Charlotte | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 58% | |
5 | FENG Audrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% | |
7 | LI Joy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 36% | |
8 | ZHAO Olivia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 62% | 14% | |
9 | LI Christina | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
10 | PUTHOFF Olivia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 14% | |
11 | JIANG Chloe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 44% | |
12 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 29% | |
13 | WANG DINA C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 13% | |
14 | DE CASTRO Kai | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | - |
15 | BERTOLINI Mia | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 13% | 1% | |
16 | YIN Chloe | 100% | 100% | 90% | 59% | 21% | 3% | |
17 | CHEN Sophie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 14% | |
18 | LAVINE Samantha | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 21% | 1% | - |
19 | SUN Erin | 100% | 96% | 72% | 28% | 3% | - | |
20 | IWERSEN Marte | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 29% | 6% |
21 | SHUTZER Lily | 100% | 98% | 81% | 40% | 6% | - | |
22 | SFINTESCU Emma | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 12% | 1% | |
23 | LI Junhan | 100% | 99% | 84% | 46% | 13% | 1% | |
24 | ZINITI-LAU Elena | 100% | 98% | 74% | 34% | 7% | 1% | |
25 | GOODMAN Carden | 100% | 94% | 64% | 22% | 3% | - | |
26 | VACCARO Lillian | 100% | 86% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - | |
27 | COLE Sofia | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 21% | 2% | |
28 | OTTAVIANO Maris | 100% | 72% | 27% | 4% | - | - | |
29 | MANGLANI Maya | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% | - |
30 | KOESTERS Florentine | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 11% | - | - |
31 | LEO Jenna | 100% | 93% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
32 | JUNCADELLA Lucy | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
33 | CHAN Kaitlyn | 100% | 77% | 31% | 5% | - | - | |
34 | MAIA ZUCKERMAN Julia | 100% | 83% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | |
35 | CHUNG Stella | 100% | 90% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | |
36 | XU-FERGUSON Victoria | 100% | 94% | 66% | 24% | 3% | - | |
37 | ZHANG Caroline | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 15% | 1% | - |
38 | JIANG Doris | 100% | 89% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
39 | BO Iris | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
40 | HONG Mabel | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
41 | MCCLELLAN Florence | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
42 | HUDSON Sophie | 100% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | |
43 | MCCORMICK Ella | 100% | 60% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
44 | BENNETT Emi | 100% | 69% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.